ArticleHeliyon2024
Exploring the impact of collaborative learning on the development of critical thinking and clinical decision-making skills in nursing students: A quantitative descriptive design.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effect of cooperative learning approach with concept maps on nursing students' knowledge acquisition on symptom management in cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Article
- Academic educators' leadership styles and their associations with student engagement and critical thinking disposition among Saudi health sciences students: a mixed-methods study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Student Leadership in Undergraduate Nursing Research: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Roles, Challenges and Professional Growth.Nursing open · 2026Article
- Influence of learning activities and background characteristics on pharmacology exam success in second-year medical students at a French university: the Pharmaquest study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Clinical decision-making competencies and work readiness in senior nursing students: a path analysis study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Structuring higher-order thinking: a national analysis of learning outcomes in Swedish undergraduate nursing thesis courses.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of Round by Peers on Critical Thinking and Clinical Decision-Making in Nursing Students.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery researchArticle
- Identifying Student Learning Challenges and Potential Solutions in Nursing Education Delivery in Rural Nova Scotia Using Photovoice.SAGE open nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to introduce collaborative learning as a method in the Mental Health and Diseases Nursing course for actively enrolled fourth-year nursing students. The objective is to assess the impact of collaborative learning on critical thinking and clinical decision-making among nursing students. Collaborative learning involves the use of small groups to help students identify effective ways of working together to enhance their learning outcomes. A quantitative research methodology was employed in this study. To evaluate the effectiveness of the collaborative learning program, a within-subject repeated-measures design was implemented. This study was conducted in the nursing department of a university in Turkey. The study included 96 female students (92.3 %) and 8 male students (7.7 %). Data collection involved the sociodemographic data form, the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CCTDI), and the Clinical Decision-Making in Nursing Scale (CDMNS). The students' pre-program CDMNS median score was 146.00 (117.00-177.00), and the post-program CDMNS median score was 147.50 (115.00-175.00). While there was an increase in the students' clinical decision-making scores after the program, this increase was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The pre-program median score for CCTDI was 223.26 (176.87-296.02), and the post-program median score was 227.88 (188.87-359.00). The students' critical thinking disposition scores showed a statistically significant increase after the program (p < 0.05). The study results revealed notable enhancements among students who participated in courses utilizing the collaborative learning method. These enhancements included heightened academic performance, elevated levels of critical thinking, increased self-confidence, and improved clinical decision-making abilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.