ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
A general prediction model for compound-protein interactions based on deep learning.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative Medicine for Liver Fibrosis: Bioactive Constituents and Therapeutic Potential of Scutellaria baicalensis.Chinese journal of integrative medicine · 2026Review
- Molecular dynamics simulation in traditional Chinese medicine research: from molecular mechanisms to multiscale validation.Frontiers in chemistry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The identification of compound-protein interactions (CPIs) is crucial for drug discovery and understanding mechanisms of action. Accurate CPI prediction can elucidate drug-target-disease interactions, aiding in the discovery of candidate compounds and effective synergistic drugs, particularly from traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). Existing Methods: To address these issues, we developed a computational model for CPI prediction by integrating the constructed large-scale bioactivity benchmark dataset with a deep learning (DL) algorithm. To verify the accuracy of our CPI model, we applied it to predict the targets of compounds in TCM. An herb pair of Results: Our CPI model demonstrated superior performance over other machine learning models, achieving an area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.98, an area under the precision-recall curve (AUPR) of 0.98, and an accuracy (ACC) of 93.31% on the test set. The model's generalization capability and applicability were further confirmed using external databases. Utilizing this model, we predicted the targets of compounds in the herb pair of Astragalus membranaceus and Hedyotis diffusaas, yielding an expanded target dataset. Then, we integrated this expanded target dataset to predict effective drug combinations using our drug synergy prediction model DeepMDS. Experimental assay on breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 proved the efficacy of the best predicted multi-compound combinations: Combination I (Epicatechin, Ursolic acid, Quercetin, Aesculetin and Astragaloside IV) exhibited a half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC Conclusion: Our CPI prediction model can serve as a useful tool for accurately identifying potential CPI for a wide range of proteins, and is expected to facilitate drug research, repurposing and support the understanding of TCM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.