Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39295907›Full record

ReviewGut microbiome (Cambridge, England)2023

Microbial gut dysbiosis induced by xenobiotics in model organisms and the relevance of experimental criteria: a minireview.

Beatriz Ibarra-Mendoza, Bruno Gomez-Gil, Miguel Betancourt-Lozano, Luciana Raggi, Beatriz Yáñez-Rivera

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gut microbiome (Cambridge, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Beatriz Ibarra-MendozaCIAD, A.C. Mazatlán Unit for Aquaculture and Environmental Management, Mazatlán, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1197-0702
Bruno Gomez-GilCIAD, A.C. Mazatlán Unit for Aquaculture and Environmental Management, Mazatlán, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3695-3597
Miguel Betancourt-LozanoCIAD, A.C. Mazatlán Unit for Aquaculture and Environmental Management, Mazatlán, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7267-4993
Luciana RaggiUniversidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo - CONACYT, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8502-4834
Beatriz Yáñez-RiveraInstituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Unidad Académica Mazatlán, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mazatlán, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3192-2142

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiota is a dynamic ecosystem involved in multiple physiological processes that affect host health. Several factors affect intestinal microbial communities including dietary exposure to xenobiotics, which is highly concerning due to their widespread distribution. Current knowledge of this topic comes from culture-dependent methods, 16S rRNA amplicon fingerprinting, and metagenomics, but a standardised procedures framework remains lacking. This minireview integrates 45 studies from a systematic search using terms related to gut microbiota and its disruption. Only publications encompassing dietary-oral exposure and experimental gut microbiota assessments were included. The results were divided and described according to the biological model used and the disruption observed in the gut microbiota. An overall dysbiotic effect was unclear due to the variety of contaminants and hosts evaluated and the experimental gaps between publications. More standardised experimental designs, including WGS and physiological tests, are needed to establish how a particular xenobiotic can alter the gut microbiota and how the results can be extrapolated.

Indexed as

gut dysbiosisgut microbiotaNGS sequencingXenobiotics

Identifiers

PMID39295907
PMCPMC11406412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.