ReviewJournal of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis2024
Assessing Comparative Efficacy of Biologics for the Treatment of Psoriasis With Nail Involvement: A Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploratory Retrospective Assessment of Patients with Psoriasis Receiving Biological Therapy.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite recent advances in biologics, there is a lack of significant evidence regarding the comparative efficacy of biologics in treating more resistant features of psoriasis, namely nail psoriasis. A systematic review synthesizing data from multiple studies is efficacious in assessing the comparative efficacy among biologics for the treatment of nail psoriasis. Objective: To evaluate and compare the efficacy of biologics for the treatment of nail psoriasis. Methods: Utilizing PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature review was conducted using the Pubmed database on November 16, 2022. Studies selected were phase 3 or 4 randomized clinical trials, clinical studies, or other randomized trials with data on the treatment with biologics for adults with nail psoriasis. Results: Sixteen studies meeting inclusion criteria were included for analysis. At 24 weeks, the highest mean NAPSI percent improvement achieved at week 24 was by brodalumab (76.9%) followed by etanercept (74%) and ixekizumab (70.5%) while the biologics achieving the greatest proportion of NAPSI 0 were adalimumab (44.6%) and ixekizumab (41%). Conclusions: This study helps elucidate the comparative efficacy of biologics for the treatment of nail psoriasis. This review suggests that brodalumab and etanercept are associated with the highest percent improvement in nail psoriasis while adalimumab and ixekizumab are associated with the greatest probability of complete nail resolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.