Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39295760›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024

Low literacy skills in adults can be largely explained by basic linguistic and domain-general predictors.

Réka Vágvölgyi, Moritz Sahlender, Hannes Schröter, Benjamin Nagengast, Thomas Dresler, Josef Schrader, Hans-Christoph Nuerk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Réka VágvölgyiCognitive and Developmental Psychology Unit, Centre for Cognitive Science, RPTU Kaiserslautern-Landau, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Moritz SahlenderGerman Institute for Adult Education - Leibniz Centre for Lifelong Learning (Deutsches Institut für Erwachsenenbildung - Leibniz-Zentrum für Lebenslanges Lernen e.V.), Bonn, Germany.
Hannes SchröterGerman Institute for Adult Education - Leibniz Centre for Lifelong Learning (Deutsches Institut für Erwachsenenbildung - Leibniz-Zentrum für Lebenslanges Lernen e.V.), Bonn, Germany.
Benjamin NagengastHector Research Institute of Education Sciences and Psychology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Thomas DreslerLEAD Graduate School & Research Network, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Josef SchraderGerman Institute for Adult Education - Leibniz Centre for Lifelong Learning (Deutsches Institut für Erwachsenenbildung - Leibniz-Zentrum für Lebenslanges Lernen e.V.), Bonn, Germany.
Hans-Christoph NuerkLEAD Graduate School & Research Network, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Despite having sufficient formal education, a large group of people cannot complete everyday tasks like reading, writing, or making basic calculations. Regarding reading, millions of people are not able to understand more complex texts despite the ability to read simple words or sentences; they have low literacy skills. Even though this problem has been known for decades, the causes and predictors of their poor reading comprehension skills are not fully explored. Socioeconomic, sociodemographic, and reading-related (i.e., linguistic) factors, especially of English-speaking participants and thus users of an opaque orthography, were often assessed. The goal of this study was to examine which linguistic, domain-general, or numerical factors predict substandard complex text reading as the core symptom of low literacy skills in adulthood. Methods: To this end, we assessed a group of German-speaking participants-users of a transparent orthography-who are at risk for complex text reading deficits. Results: The results indicated that linguistic variables (reduced word/pseudoword reading, weaker oral semantic and grammatical comprehension), working memory, and age predicted lower performance in text comprehension. This model explained 73% of the total variance, indicating that most of the deficits in complex text reading can be explained by a group of basic underlying linguistic and domain-general factors. Discussion: We conclude that interventions for adults with low literacy skills and others at risk for complex text reading deficits should address word/pseudoword reading and focus on both written and oral comprehension.

Indexed as

domain-general functionsfunctional illiteracylow literacynumeracypoor reading adultsstruggling adult readerstext comprehensiontransparent orthography

Identifiers

PMID39295760
PMCPMC11408358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.