ArticleCureus2024
Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Condylar Position and Joint Spaces Following Orthodontic Treatment With Quadruple Premolar Extractions.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sheldon Friel Memorial Lecture 2025-Orthodontics and Temporomandibular Disorders: evolving views on risk factors, diagnosis, and management.European journal of orthodontics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the alterations in the temporomandibular joint among adult patients undergoing orthodontic treatment involving the extraction of four premolars. A cohort of 44 adults, with a mean age of 24.2 years, underwent orthodontic therapy that included quadruple premolar extractions. Cone-beam computed tomography scans were performed before and after the treatment to evaluate the temporomandibular joints. The three-dimensional assessment focused on the condylar position relative to the cranial base and the articular fossa, the axial condylar rotation, and the joint spaces. Notably, a significant posterior shift of the condyle was detected (P≤0.01), averaging a 0.41mm retraction. The posterior joint space narrowed by 0.32mm post-treatment. Additionally, a medial tilt of 0.62° in the condyle's long axis was observed in the frontal plane. No significant changes were recorded for the other condylar positions, rotations, or joint space dimensions. The findings suggest that orthodontic treatment with four premolar extractions may instigate condylar repositioning and rotation. These insights can inform refinements in treatment protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.