ReviewCureus2024
Implant Mechanics, Biological Milieu, and Peri-Implantitis: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cytocompatibility assessment of an anaerobic adhesive for use in implant dentistry: An in vitro study.Journal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry · 2026Article
- Molecular docking and dynamics simulation of antimicrobial peptides against adhesion proteins of peri-implant pathogens.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Peri-implant diseases triggered by oral microdysbiosis: pathogenesis and precision intervention strategies.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dental implants constitute an important treatment modality for rehabilitating edentulous and partially edentulous arches. With more implant systems in the market, understanding the mechanical aspects of implants is crucial in understanding this indispensable therapy. However, microflora-related factors i.e. biological factors are also crucial. Despite the tremendous success rate of dental implants, it is not averse to failure. Both mechanical and microbial aspects in seclusion or together predispose to implant failure. Newer technological advances have paved the way for advanced techniques to identify the not-so-common flora causing implant failure. This review focuses on detailed mechanical and biological aspects and the sealing agent used to seal the implant-abutment interface. It also focuses on advanced molecular techniques like metagenomics and transcriptomics. A thorough literature search was performed with selected articles from electronic databases. A combination of in-vivo and in-vitro studies were considered to provide comprehensive information on the subject. Both the biomechanical aspects like micro gap, and microleakage, as well as microbial movements play confluent roles in implant failure. The focus should be on the different aspects through which microflora can penetrate the inner parts of the implant. Also, newer culture-independent techniques of detecting previously undetected oral flora should be included in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.