Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39295699›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Gradient Boosting Prediction of Overlapping Genes From Weighted Co-expression and Differential Gene Expression Analysis of Wnt Pathway: An Artificial Intelligence-Based Bioinformatics Study.

Pradeep Kumar Yadalam, Ramya R, Raghavendra Vamsi Anegundi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pradeep Kumar YadalamPeriodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institue of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS) Deemed University, Chennai, IND.
Ramya ROral Pathology and Oral Biology, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institue of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS) Deemed University, Chennai, IND.
Raghavendra Vamsi AnegundiPeriodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institue of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS) Deemed University, Chennai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction The Wnt (wingless-related integration site) signalling pathway is crucial for bone formation and remodelling, regulating the commitment of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to the osteoblastic lineage. It triggers the transcriptional activation of Wnt target genes and promotes osteoblast proliferation and survival. Weighted co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and differential gene expression analysis help researchers understand gene roles. Gradient boosting, a machine learning technique, enhances understanding of genetic and molecular mechanisms contributing to overlap genes, improving gene regulation and functional genomics. The aim is to predict overlapping genes in the Wnt signalling pathway. Methods Differential gene expression analysis was performed using the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) geo dataset-GSE251951, focusing on the effect of Wnt signaling on treatment. The WGCNA module was analyzed using the iDEP tool to identify interconnected gene clusters. Hub genes were identified by calculating module eigengenes, correlated with external traits, and ranked based on module membership values. The study utilized gradient boosting, an ensemble learning method, to predict models, evaluate their performance using metrics like accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score, and adjust predictions based on gradient and learning rate. Results The dendrogram uses the "Dynamic TreeCut" algorithm to analyze gene clusters, aiding researchers in understanding gene modules and biological processes, identifying co-expressed genes, and discovering new pathways. The confusion matrix displays 88 actual and predicted cases. The gradient boosting model achieves 78.9% accuracy in predicting Wnt pathway overlapping genes, with a respectable area under the curve (AUC) and classification accuracy values. It accurately predicts 73.9% of samples, with a high precision ratio and low recall. Conclusion Future research should enhance differential expression analysis and WGCNA to identify key Wnt pathway genes, improve sensitivity, specificity, hyperparameter tuning, and validation experiments, and use larger datasets.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebone formationgeneweighted co-expression network analysiswnt pathway

Identifiers

PMID39295699
PMCPMC11410066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.