ArticleCureus2024
Left Infrapatellar Branch of the Saphenous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Relieves Refractory Pain Following Total Knee Replacement.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- 60-Day Peripheral Nerve Stimulation in Chronic Knee Pain: A Retrospective Analysis.Orthopedic reviews · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoarthritis, the most common joint disease of adults worldwide, is increasing in prevalence due to an increase in aging and rates of obesity in developed countries. Treatment options include physical therapy, pharmacologic management, non-pharmacologic management, and total knee replacement surgery. When conservative measures fail, total knee replacement surgery is pursued. The patient is a 61-year-old woman with a history of severe chronic osteoarthritic knee pain following total left and right knee arthroplasty in 2016 and 2019, respectively, who presents with refractory post-total knee replacement pain. Following her surgeries, the patient was in excruciating 10/10 pain on the numerical rating scale (NRS) and was unable to walk or stand. She underwent revisions which, unfortunately, did not ameliorate her pain. She was later referred to chronic pain management in which a peripheral nerve stimulator (PNS) was offered and implanted. Following her PNS trial, the patient achieved >80% pain relief in her left knee. After the permanent PNS implant, the patient noted she had 100% pain relief (0/10 on the NRS) in her left knee and was able to regain mobility. Here, we discuss a case demonstrating rapid pain relief following the minimally invasive PNS implantation for refractory pain following total knee arthroplasty. Refractory pain following total knee arthroplasty can increase morbidity and mortality as a consequence. Thus, proper management is needed to reduce these adverse outcomes. In patients who have failed conservative medical management, PNS may be an alternative, efficacious treatment option for refractory knee pain. Despite the efficacy in our case, further research is needed to define the optimal patient group that would benefit from PNS for refractory knee pain following total knee arthroplasty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.