ArticleCureus2024
Perforation, Migration, and Omentum Embedding of a Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The wandering intrauterine contraceptive device: An unusual case of omental IUCD migration with multimodality imaging findings.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Small bowel necrosis caused by migrated intrauterine device: a rare surgical emergency.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Migrated intra-uterine device to infra-umbilical skin: a rare case report.BMC women's health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The intrauterine device (IUD) is currently one of the most widely used methods due to its great effectiveness. Uterine perforation and migration of the device is one of its most serious complications, although rare. In most patients, it usually occurs at the time of placement and goes unnoticed; however, it can also occur late. The diagnosis is established by imaging studies, preferring abdominal ultrasound, and its treatment should be removal in all cases. We present the case of a 27-year-old woman, with a history of levonorgestrel IUD placement two years earlier, who presented with chronic pelvic pain. During a gynecological consultation, the IUD threads were not evident. An abdominal CT scan showed that the IUD was in the abdominal cavity, so open abdominal surgery was performed where the IUD was found embedded in the omentum and the segment of the omentum containing the IUD was resected. The patient evolved satisfactorily and was discharged 24 hours after surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.