Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39295658›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Penile Calciphylaxis Obscured by Phimosis in an End-Stage Renal Disease Patient: A Case Report.

Chathurangi U Angammana, Hilary Fernando, Fhds Silva

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chathurangi U AngammanaInternal Medicine, Colombo South Teaching Hospital, Colombo, LKA.
Hilary FernandoUrology, Teaching Hospital, Ratnapura, Ratnapura, LKA.
Fhds SilvaInternal Medicine, Colombo South Teaching Hospital, Colombo, LKA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Penile calciphylaxis is a rare and severe complication primarily observed in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing dialysis. A 50-year-old man presented with severe penile pain and phimosis. He had a history of hypertension and diabetes mellitus for 10 years, complicated by ESRD and was awaiting a cadaveric kidney transplant. He was on cinacalcet therapy for tertiary hyperparathyroidism. The patient underwent circumcision at which discolouration and necrotic patches involving the glans penis were noted. The histological findings were consistent with calciphylaxis and suppurative inflammation. However, due to persistent severe pain and progressive gangrene, a partial penectomy was performed. This report demonstrates the importance of consideration of calciphylaxis in patients with ESRD when presenting with penile pain, even phimosis.

Indexed as

end stage renal disease (esrd)hemodialysispartial penectomypenile calciphylaxisphimosis

Identifiers

PMID39295658
PMCPMC11408742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.