ArticleCureus2024
Medical Students' Confidence After "CardioSim": A Low-Fidelity, Peer Role-Play Simulation.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPlans to increase medical student numbers will increase costs and potentially reduce clinical exposure. Simulation can be utilised to fill that gap. Low-fidelity simulation with peer role-play (PRP) provides reduced costs and standardisation of experience compared to high-fidelity or simulated patient RP simulation. This study aimed to assess changes in confidence in common graduate-level skills following a low-fidelity PRP scenario.
methodsForty-three fourth-year medical students were divided into groups of three and five students. A Likert-scale questionnaire was completed at the start of the session. During the simulation, they had the opportunity to be the doctor and the patient and observe the remaining scenarios. Finally, the same questionnaire was answered.
resultsAll students gained confidence in at least two aspects. All students were confident in history taking and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) management at the end of the session. The biggest improvement in overall confidence was in the management of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) (62.8%) and Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation (SBAR) handover (60.5%). Six students improved their confidence by at least one ranking in every question, and one student improved their confidence by three rankings in four questions. SBAR handover and management of pneumothorax had the biggest improvements.
conclusionLow-fidelity RP simulation allows the development of confidence in technical and non-technical skills. Given increasing student numbers and increasing medical education costs, it can be utilised effectively as part of a simulation syllabus that helps prepare students for clinical practice. Areas of further research include focus groups, knowledge tests and comparisons to other forms of simulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.