Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39295626›Full record

Trial reportTurkish journal of medical sciences2024

Spinal stabilization exercises for transversus abdominis and lumbar multifidus thickness via telerehabilitation and face-to-face approaches in patients with nonspecific chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Dilara Onan, Erkan Demirci, Egemen Turhan, Özlem Ülger

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07502573 (COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF ASYNCHRONOUS TELEREHABILITATION AND HOME EXERCISE PROGRAM ON PAIN, PAIN FEAR, FUNCTIONALITY, AND PERFORMANCE IN INDIVIDUALS WITH PIRIFORMIS SYNDROME), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07502573 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of the effects of asynchronous telerehabilitation and home exercise program on pain, pain fear, functionality, and performance in individuals with piriformis syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorHacettepe UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled46ConditionsPiriformis Syndrome, Exercise Training, TelerehabilitationArmsHome exercise programme, telerehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dilara OnanDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Yozgat Bozok University, Yozgat, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9505-6135
Erkan DemirciDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Hospital, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4221-6734
Egemen TurhanDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1971-704X
Özlem ÜlgerSpine Health Unit, Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3908-223X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/aim: Strengthening the muscles of the lumbar region in individuals with neck pain may be protective against future back problems. In addition, telerehabilitation applications, which gained momentum in the literature and clinical practice during the COVID-19 pandemic, are among the applications preferred by patients thanks to their various advantages. This study aimed to compare the effects of telerehabilitation and spinal stabilization exercises applied with face-to-face approaches on the thickness of the transversus abdominis (M.TrA) and lumbar multifidus (M.LM) muscles in patients with nonspecific neck pain. Materials and methods: The primary outcomes were the thickness of the M.TrA and M.LM. Neck pain intensity and neck disability were secondary outcomes. Muscle thickness was evaluated with an ultrasound device, neck pain intensity was assessed with a visual analog scale, and disability was assessed with the Neck Disability Index. Patients were randomly assigned to the telerehabilitation group (TRG) (n = 13) or the control group (CG) (n = 13). While the TRG did the exercises with live videos and video recordings, the CG did exercises face-to-face in the clinic. Both groups performed the same exercises for 45 minutes per session 3 days a week for 8 weeks. Results: At the end of the treatment, the thicknesses of the M.TrA and M.LM were increased and neck pain intensity and neck disability were decreased in both groups (p < 0.05). The groups were similar in terms of these variables (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Telerehabilitation and face-to-face spinal stabilization exercises are both beneficial for spinal muscle architecture and clinical variables as a preventive measure against future lower back problems in individuals with neck pain.

Indexed as

Abdominal MusclesChronic PainExercise TherapyNeck PainTelerehabilitationAdultCOVID-19FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementParaspinal MusclesSARS-CoV-2exerciselumbar multifidusNeck paintelerehabilitationthicknesstransversus abdominis

Identifiers

PMID39295626
PMCPMC11407346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.