ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2024
Effect of vascularized jejunal conduit flap on peripheral nerve regeneration in rats.
Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Combined use of olfactory mucosal mesenchymal stem cells conditioned medium and neural guide conduits promotes nerve regeneration in an ovine model.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/aim: In the literature, almost all of the nerve conduits proposed for obtaining better nerve recovery were applied as graft materials. In this study, we aimed to propose a new nerve conduit model with a flap pattern and evaluate the effect of a pedicled vascularized jejunal flap on nerve regeneration after wrapping it around a sciatic nerve. Materials and methods: A total of 90 Wistar albino rats were randomly divided into nine groups with 10 rats in each. The first three groups constituted the control groups, whereas Groups 4-6 were the jejunum conduit (JC)-applied groups. A mucosa-resected JC (MRJC) was applied in Groups 7 and 8. Epineurial neurorrhaphy was performed in Groups 1, 4, and 7; repair with a nerve graft was applied in Groups 2, 5, and 8; and a 1-cm-long nerve defect was created in Groups 3, 6, and 9. After 2 months of follow-up, nerve regeneration was assessed by statistical analyses of the Sciatic Functional Index (SFI) and histopathological evaluation. Results: The MRJC groups had significantly better results in terms of SFI (p = 0.005). Statistical differences in axonal degeneration, axonal density, myelination, and disorganization were found between all control groups and MRJC groups (p = 0.022, p = 0.001, p = 0.001, and p = 0.039, respectively). Conclusion: In this study, the feasibility of wrapping around the nerve repair zones of pedicled autologous flaps designed in a tubular fashion was observed in a small rat model. The findings must be further validated with larger animals before clinical testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.