Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39294832›Full record

SynthesisEnvironmental evidence2024

Biochar improves the nutrient cycle in sandy-textured soils and increases crop yield: a systematic review.

Madina Bekchanova, Luca Campion, Stephan Bruns, Tom Kuppens, Johannes Lehmann, Marijke Jozefczak, Ann Cuypers, Robert Malina

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Environmental evidence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Madina BekchanovaCentre for Environmental Sciences, Research Group Environmental Economics, UHasselt-Hasselt University, Agoralaan Gebouw D, 3590, Diepenbeek, Belgium. madina.bekchanova@uhasselt.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1449-1237
Luca CampionCentre for Environmental Sciences, Research Group Environmental Economics, UHasselt-Hasselt University, Agoralaan Gebouw D, 3590, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Stephan BrunsCentre for Environmental Sciences, Research Group Environmental Economics, UHasselt-Hasselt University, Agoralaan Gebouw D, 3590, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Tom KuppensCentre for Environmental Sciences, Research Group Environmental Economics, UHasselt-Hasselt University, Agoralaan Gebouw D, 3590, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Johannes LehmannSchool of Integrative Plant Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Marijke JozefczakCentre for Environmental Sciences, Research Group Environmental Biology, UHasselt-Hasselt University, Agoralaan Gebouw D, 3590, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Ann CuypersCentre for Environmental Sciences, Research Group Environmental Biology, UHasselt-Hasselt University, Agoralaan Gebouw D, 3590, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Robert MalinaCentre for Environmental Sciences, Research Group Environmental Economics, UHasselt-Hasselt University, Agoralaan Gebouw D, 3590, Diepenbeek, Belgium.

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (S000119NBA)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiochar is a relatively new development in sustainable agricultural management that can be applied to ameliorate degraded and less fertile soils, especially sandy-textured ones, to improve their productivity with respect to crop production through improved nutrient availability. However, as the literature has shown, the response of sandy-textured soils to biochar varies in terms of effect size and direction. Therefore, the present study systematically reviewed the available evidence to synthesize the impact of biochar amendments on aspects of the nutrient cycle of sandy-textured soils.

methodsBoth peer-reviewed and gray literature were searched in English in bibliographic databases, organizational web pages, and Internet search engines. Articles underwent a two-stage screening (title and abstract, and full-text) based on predefined criteria, with consistency checks. Validity assessments were conducted, utilizing specifically designed tools for study validity. Data extraction involved categorizing the various properties of the nutrient cycle into nine main Soil and Plant Properties (SPPs), each of which was studied independently. Nine meta-analyses were performed using a total of 1609 observations derived from 92 articles. Comparing meta-averages with and without correction for publication bias suggests that publication bias plays a minor role in the literature, while some indication for publication bias is found when accounting for heterogeneity by means of meta-regressions. REVIEW

findingsAccording to the results, soil total and available nitrogen [N], phosphorous [P] and potassium [K], plant nutrient level, and potential cation exchange capacity (CEC) increased by 36% (CI [23%, 50%]), 34% (CI [15%, 57%]), 15% (CI [1%, 31%]), and 18% (CI [3%, 36%), respectively, and N

Indexed as

Biomass productionFood crop yieldMeta-analysisSoil amendmentSoil ecosystem servicesSoil fertilitySoil propertiesSustainable agriculture

Identifiers

PMID39294832
PMCPMC11376106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.