Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39294828›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental evidence2023

Existing evidence on the effects of photovoltaic panels on biodiversity: a systematic map with critical appraisal of study validity.

Alix Lafitte, Romain Sordello, Dakis-Yaoba Ouédraogo, Chloé Thierry, Geoffroy Marx, Jérémy Froidevaux, Bertrand Schatz, Christian Kerbiriou, Philippe Gourdain, Yorick Reyjol

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental evidence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alix LafittePatriNat (OFB (Office Français de la Biodiversité) - MNHN (Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle)), 75005, Paris, France. alix.lafitte@mnhn.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6118-7647
Romain SordelloPatriNat (OFB (Office Français de la Biodiversité) - MNHN (Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle)), 75005, Paris, France.
Dakis-Yaoba OuédraogoPatriNat (OFB (Office Français de la Biodiversité) - MNHN (Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle)), 75005, Paris, France.
Chloé ThierryPatriNat (OFB (Office Français de la Biodiversité) - MNHN (Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle)), 75005, Paris, France.
Geoffroy MarxLPO (Ligue Pour la Protection Des Oiseaux), 17300, Rochefort, France.
Jérémy FroidevauxCESCO (Centre d'Ecologie et des Sciences de la Conservation), UMR 7204, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle (MNHN), 75005, Paris, France.
Bertrand SchatzCEFE, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, 34090, Montpellier, France.
Christian KerbiriouCESCO (Centre d'Ecologie et des Sciences de la Conservation), UMR 7204, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle (MNHN), 75005, Paris, France.
Philippe GourdainPatriNat (OFB (Office Français de la Biodiversité) - MNHN (Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle)), 75005, Paris, France.
Yorick ReyjolPatriNat (OFB (Office Français de la Biodiversité) - MNHN (Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle)), 75005, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo phase out fossil fuels and reach a carbon-neutral future, solar energy and notably photovoltaic (PV) installations are being rapidly scaled up. Unlike other types of renewable energies such as wind and hydroelectricity, evidence on the effects of PV installations on biodiversity has been building up only fairly recently and suggests that they may directly impact ecosystems and species through, for instance, habitat change and loss, mortality, behaviour alteration or population displacements. Hence, we conducted a systematic map of existing evidence aiming at answering the following question: what evidence exists regarding the effects of PV installations on wild terrestrial and semi-aquatic species?

methodsWe searched for relevant citations on four online publication databases, on Google Scholar, on four specialised websites and through a call for grey literature. Citations were then screened for eligibility in order to only retain citations referring to wild terrestrial and semi-aquatic species as well as PV and solar thermal installations, therefore excluding concentrated solar power. Accepted articles were first split into studies (corresponding to one experimental design) subjected to critical appraisal and then further split into observations (i.e. one population and one outcome) during metadata extraction. The current state of the literature was characterised and knowledge clusters and gaps identified. REVIEW

findingsSearching captured 8121 unique citations, which resulted in 158 relevant articles being accepted after screening. Even though the first article was published in 2005, the publication rate increased rapidly in 2020. The 97 included primary research and modelling articles were split into 137 unique studies and rated with either a low (43.8%), a high (41.6%) or an unclear overall risk of bias (14.6%) after internal validity assessment. Studies were further split into 434 observations, mainly carried out in the United States (23.0%) and the United Kingdom (21.0%), preferentially in temperate climates (64.5%). Plants and arthropods were the two most studied taxa (41.7% and 26.3%, respectively). Utility-scale solar energy (USSE) facilities were most often investigated (70.1%). Observations mainly focused on the effect of the presence of PV installations (51.8%). Species abundance, community composition and species diversity were the most common outcomes assessed (23.0%, 18.4% and 16.1%, respectively).

conclusionsThree knowledge clusters for which a systematic review should be contemplated were identified: (i) the effects of PV installations on plant and (ii) arthropod communities and, (iii) their effects at a larger ecosystem scale on overall species abundance. However, the currently available evidence regarding the effects of photovoltaic installations on biodiversity is still scarce. More research is urgently needed on non-flying mammals and bats as well as amphibians and reptiles. Solar thermal panels and floating PV installations should also be further investigated. Studies comparing different designs of PV installations, management practices or contexts should be conducted as well. Indeed, more evidence is still needed to allow decision-makers to accurately and reliably select the types of PV installations and management practices that are least damaging to biodiversity.

Indexed as

ConservationEnergy transitionEvidence synthesisFloating solarGreen infrastructureGround-mounted photovoltaicSolar panelsWildlife

Identifiers

PMID39294828
PMCPMC11378773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.