Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39294823›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental evidence2024

Existing evidence on the potential of soils constructed from mineral wastes to support biodiversity: a systematic map.

Dakis-Yaoba Ouédraogo, Alix Lafitte, Romain Sordello, Florie Pozzi, Irina Mikajlo, José Hilario Rocha Araujo, Yorick Reyjol, Thomas Z Lerch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental evidence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dakis-Yaoba OuédraogoPatriNat (OFB-MNHN-CNRS-IRD), 75005, Paris, France. dakis.ouedraogo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2674-2259
Alix LafittePatriNat (OFB-MNHN-CNRS-IRD), 75005, Paris, France.
Romain SordelloPatriNat (OFB-MNHN-CNRS-IRD), 75005, Paris, France.
Florie PozziECT, 77230, Villeneuve Sous Dammartin, France.
Irina MikajloInstitute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences of Paris (SU, CNRS, IRD, INRAE, UPEC, UPC), 32 Avenue Henri Varagnat, 93140, Bondy, France.
José Hilario Rocha AraujoInstitute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences of Paris (SU, CNRS, IRD, INRAE, UPEC, UPC), 32 Avenue Henri Varagnat, 93140, Bondy, France.
Yorick ReyjolPatriNat (OFB-MNHN-CNRS-IRD), 75005, Paris, France.
Thomas Z LerchInstitute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences of Paris (SU, CNRS, IRD, INRAE, UPEC, UPC), 32 Avenue Henri Varagnat, 93140, Bondy, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe development of cities and transport infrastructure produces a large volume of mineral waste (e.g. excavated earth material). At the same time, cities are increasingly trying to develop green infrastructures, given the ecosystem services they provide to people, but this comes with considerable economic and environmental costs associated with the transfer of fertile soil from rural areas to cities. In a circular economy approach, the reuse of mineral waste to build fertile soil is a substantial opportunity to reduce the economic and environmental costs of both mineral waste management and green infrastructure development. Soils constructed from these materials (constructed Technosols) must be able to support vegetation growth and become a suitable living environment for soil organisms. This requires ecological engineering to maximise the potential of constructed soils for biodiversity, both from a taxonomic and functional perspective. In this context, we systematically mapped the evidence related to the ability of soils constructed from mineral wastes to support biodiversity.

methodsWe gathered published and grey literature through searches in two publications databases (Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection), one search engine (Google Scholar), nine organisational websites and through a call for literature. Titles, abstracts, and full-texts were successively screened using eligibility criteria. All included studies were described with coded variables and a database was produced. The extent of evidence was assessed and knowledge clusters and gaps were identified. REVIEW

findingsThe searches yielded 9265 articles, and 153 articles were retained after the screening process. More than half of these articles were from European countries, with France leading the field with 40 articles, followed by Spain (15 articles) and Italy (10 articles). Most of the articles (75%) were produced after 2015. The main reasons for constructing soils from mineral waste were for mine rehabilitation (35%), waste recycling (16%) and experimental purpose (15%). The 153 articles were divided into 1962 studies, a study being a combination of a taxon, an intervention (i.e. soil construction) and a measured outcome. Among these studies, the most studied biological group is plants (69% of studies) and especially herbaceous species (32%), followed by microorganisms (17%) and invertebrates (14%). The most used type of mineral waste is mine waste (31% of studies) followed by excavated soil (16%) and demolition waste (14%). Finally, the most frequently measured outcome is plant growth (42% of studies), followed by organism abundance (16%) and diversity (10%).

conclusionsThree main knowledge clusters were identified which could be addressed in the future for full synthesis of the results: (1) How well do plants grow in soils constructed from mineral wastes? (2) What is the potential of soils constructed from mineral wastes to support biodiversity? and (3) How do microbial communities develop in soils constructed from mineral wastes? There is a lack of studies investigating several biological groups at the same time: only 6 articles out of 153 investigated the response of both plants, invertebrates and microorganisms to soil construction. More research is therefore needed on the ability to support a diversity of organisms.

Indexed as

Anthropogenic soilAnthroposolAnthrosolArtificial soilCircular economyConstructed TechnosolsConstruction and Demolition wastePedological engineeringRecycling

Identifiers

PMID39294823
PMCPMC11378810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.