Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39294806›Full record

ArticleAdvances in simulation (London, England)2024

Using simulation scenarios and a debriefing structure to promote feedback skills among interprofessional team members in clinical practice.

Bodil Thorsager Svendsen, Lene Funck Petersen, Anders Skjelsager, Anne Lippert, Doris Østergaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in simulation (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bodil Thorsager SvendsenDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Herlev Gentofte University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark.
Lene Funck PetersenCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation CAMES, Herlev Hospital, Capital Region of Denmark, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, Opgang 1, etage 25, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.
Anders SkjelsagerCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation CAMES, Herlev Hospital, Capital Region of Denmark, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, Opgang 1, etage 25, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.
Anne LippertCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation CAMES, Herlev Hospital, Capital Region of Denmark, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, Opgang 1, etage 25, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.
Doris ØstergaardCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation CAMES, Herlev Hospital, Capital Region of Denmark, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, Opgang 1, etage 25, 2730, Herlev, Denmark. doris.oestergaard@regionh.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8542-6999

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTeam reflexivity and peer feedback in daily clinical work can improve patient safety. However, teams do not always engage in reflection after patient care. A reason could be that team members may lack skills in engaging in team reflection. This study explores the use of interprofessional team-based simulations to encourage and equip teams for reflective conversations in the real-world clinical practice.

methodsThis was a prospective, explorative study of team members' perceptions of the use of in situ simulation-based scenarios with critically ill patient cases to train team-based reflections and peer feedback. The study took place in two neurological wards. Prior to the intervention, a 1-day observation in each ward and semi-structured short interviews with physicians and nurses were conducted.

resultsA total of 94 staff members, 57 nurses, 8 nurse assistants and 29 physicians participated in the in situ simulation scenarios. All team members showed appreciation of the safe learning environment. The authors found that the simulations and the debriefing structure provided an opportunity for training of team reflexivity and feedback. The team members evaluated the simulation-based training very positively, and their initial reaction indicated that they found peer feedback useful for the individual and the team. This approach allowed them to reflect on their own clinical practice.

conclusionThe simulation-based training scenarios and the debriefing structure promoted team members' team reflexivity and peer feedback skills. The method is feasible and could be used in other specialties and situations. The team members' reactions to feedback were positive, and based on their reflections, there is a potential to increase both individual and team skills as well as improve patient treatment.

Identifiers

PMID39294806
PMCPMC11412003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.