Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39294762›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental evidence2024

Existing evidence on the use of environmental DNA as an operational method for studying rivers: a systematic map and thematic synthesis.

R Cruz-Cano, M Kolb, R A Saldaña-Vázquez, L Bretón-Deval, N Cruz-Cano, A Aldama-Cervantes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental evidence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

R Cruz-CanoInstitute of Geography, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Circuito Exterior s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, C.P. 04510, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6578-127X
M KolbInstitute of Geography, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Circuito Exterior s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, C.P. 04510, Mexico City, Mexico. melanesien@gmail.com.
R A Saldaña-VázquezInstituto de Investigaciones en Medio Ambiente Xabier Gorostiaga S. J, Universidad Iberoamericana Puebla, San Andrés Cholula, Mexico.
L Bretón-DevalDepartamento de Microbiología Molecular, Instituto de Biotecnología, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Morelos, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
N Cruz-CanoFacultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Avenida de los Barrios s/n, Los Reyes Iztacala, C.P. 54110, Tlalnepantla, Estado de México, Mexico.
A Aldama-CervantesPosgrado en Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Circuito Exterior s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, C.P. 04510, Mexico City, Mexico.

Funding

CONACYT CVU: 516486UNAM-PAPIIT IN211921
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnvironmental DNA (eDNA) is the DNA that can be extracted from an environmental sample, enabling the monitoring of whole biological communities across a large number of samples, at a potentially lower cost, which can significantly benefit river conservation. A systematic mapping protocol was designed to investigate the use of eDNA in rivers, specifically in terms of research topics, geographic and taxonomic biases, as well as information gaps. Furthermore, the potential research opportunities of eDNA in rivers and possible paths to find this kind of information on available platforms are identified.

methodsA published systematic map protocol was applied, consisting of a search for published articles and gray literature in two bibliographic databases and one search engine. All search results were submitted to a 2-stage screening for relevance and pertinence in accordance with pre-defined eligibility criteria. Data extraction and codification regarding country of study, year, taxonomic group, sequencing platform, and type of technique employed resulted in a publicly available database.

resultsFrom 7372 studies initially obtained by the search, 545 met the inclusion criteria spanning a period from 2003 to 2022. The five countries with most studies are: USA (134), Japan (61), China (54), Brazil (29) and the UK (25). The most used fragments to analyze DNA are 16S and COI, whilst 26S and 23S are the least used. Only 84 (15%) of the studies reported hypervariable regions, among which the most used are V4 and V5. Regarding taxonomic groups, fishes are most often studied (176), followed by bacteria (138) and virus (52), while fungi is the least studied group (3). Concerning data availability, 229 (42%) studies provided access to sequencing data.

conclusionsThis study presents a comprehensive analysis of the available evidence regarding the implementation of the eDNA methods in rivers. The findings indicate that since the year 2003, this approach has been applied to aquatic lotic systems, and their recent increase can be attributed to the development of Next-Generation-Sequencing technologies and their reduced costs. However, there is a bias towards high-income countries, particularly USA and Europe. Widespread use and applications of this approach at a global level would allow for the generation of a large amount of information that can be compared between countries to understand if responses of aquatic systems follow similar patterns worldwide.

Indexed as

Global trendsLoticMetagenomicsNGSROSESWater

Identifiers

PMID39294762
PMCPMC11376102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.