ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024
Three-dimensional mapping of necrotic lesions for early-stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Finite element analysis of CT-based lateral classification of Japanese Investigation Committee type C1 osteonecrosis of femoral head and its prognostic value].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026Article
- A simple linear alternative to necrotic volume for predicting collapse in osteonecrosis of the femoral head.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is a scarcity of evidence regarding the potential relationship between the size and location of necrotic lesions, which must be understood to provide optimal joint-preserving treatment. The purpose of this study was to characterize the distribution patterns of necrotic lesions of varying sizes in early-stage osteonecrosis of femoral head (ONFH) with the use of three-dimensional mapping.
methodsWe retrospectively evaluated clinical CT images of the hips that were performed in the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University from January 2018 to December 2022 and collected all CT images diagnosed with stage I and II ONFH. Three-dimensional structures that included both necrotic lesions and normal areas of the femoral heads were reconstructed and divided into eight regions to record their size and location. CT images for all lesions were superimposed onto a standard template, and three-dimensional mapping was created to determine the presence of concentrated areas of lesions.
resultsIn a cohort of 143 patients with stage I and II ONFH, a total of 150 hips were reviewed. For lesions with less than 15% of the femoral head volume, necrotic lesions predominantly involve regions I, III, and V, with region I showing concentration. For lesions with volumes ranging from 15 to 30%, necrotic lesions exhibited a wider distribution across regions I, II, III, IV, V, and VII, with significant concentrations in regions I, III, and V. For lesions exceeding 30% of the femoral head volume, the necrotic lesions were extensively distributed across nearly the entire femoral head, with a notable expansion of the concentrated necrotic areas.
conclusionsThe distribution of necrotic lesions varies with lesion size, with smaller lesions primarily concentrated in the anterior and medial regions of the femoral head, particularly in the anterosuperior region, while larger lesions expand to the lateral and inferior regions. These findings enhance existing classification systems and provide crucial insights for guiding hip-preserving surgical planning and approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.