Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39294723›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental evidence2022

The global environmental agenda urgently needs a semantic web of knowledge.

Stefano Balbi, Kenneth J Bagstad, Ainhoa Magrach, Maria Jose Sanz, Naikoa Aguilar-Amuchastegui, Carlo Giupponi, Ferdinando Villa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental evidence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stefano BalbiBasque Centre for Climate Change (BC3), Scientific Campus of the University of the Basque Country, Sede Building 1, 1st floor, Barrio Sarriena S/N, 48940, Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain. stefano.balbi@bc3research.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8190-5968
Kenneth J BagstadU.S. Geological Survey, Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center, Denver, CO, USA.
Ainhoa MagrachBasque Centre for Climate Change (BC3), Scientific Campus of the University of the Basque Country, Sede Building 1, 1st floor, Barrio Sarriena S/N, 48940, Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain.
Maria Jose SanzBasque Centre for Climate Change (BC3), Scientific Campus of the University of the Basque Country, Sede Building 1, 1st floor, Barrio Sarriena S/N, 48940, Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain.
Naikoa Aguilar-AmuchasteguiWorld Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC, USA.
Carlo GiupponiDepartment of Economics, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Venice, Italy.
Ferdinando VillaBasque Centre for Climate Change (BC3), Scientific Campus of the University of the Basque Country, Sede Building 1, 1st floor, Barrio Sarriena S/N, 48940, Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain.

Funding

Maria de maeztu MDM-2017-0714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Progress in key social-ecological challenges of the global environmental agenda (e.g., climate change, biodiversity conservation, Sustainable Development Goals) is hampered by a lack of integration and synthesis of existing scientific evidence. Facing a fast-increasing volume of data, information remains compartmentalized to pre-defined scales and fields, rarely building its way up to collective knowledge. Today's distributed corpus of human intelligence, including the scientific publication system, cannot be exploited with the efficiency needed to meet current evidence synthesis challenges; computer-based intelligence could assist this task. Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based approaches underlain by semantics and machine reasoning offer a constructive way forward, but depend on greater understanding of these technologies by the science and policy communities and coordination of their use. By labelling web-based scientific information to become readable by both humans and computers, machines can search, organize, reuse, combine and synthesize information quickly and in novel ways. Modern open science infrastructure-i.e., public data and model repositories-is a useful starting point, but without shared semantics and common standards for machine actionable data and models, our collective ability to build, grow, and share a collective knowledge base will remain limited. The application of semantic and machine reasoning technologies by a broad community of scientists and decision makers will favour open synthesis to contribute and reuse knowledge and apply it toward decision making.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceGlobal challengesKnowledge integration and synthesisSemanticsSustainability

Identifiers

PMID39294723
PMCPMC11378787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.