Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39294645›Full record

ReviewJournal of nanobiotechnology2024

Brain-on-a-chip: an emerging platform for studying the nanotechnology-biology interface for neurodegenerative disorders.

Raquel O Rodrigues, Su-Ryon Shin, Manuel Bañobre-López

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Advanced Brain-on-a-Chip for Wetware Computing: A Review.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Opportunities and Challenges of Brain-on-a-Chip Interfaces.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2025
    Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Raquel O RodriguesAdvanced (Magnetic) Theranostic Nanostructures Lab, Nanomedicine Unit, INL-International Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory, Av. Mestre José Veiga, Braga, 4715-330, Portugal.
Su-Ryon ShinDivision of Engineering in Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA. sshin4@bhw.harvard.edu.
Manuel Bañobre-LópezAdvanced (Magnetic) Theranostic Nanostructures Lab, Nanomedicine Unit, INL-International Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory, Av. Mestre José Veiga, Braga, 4715-330, Portugal. manuel.banobre@inl.int.

Funding

2014-2020 INTERREG Cooperation Programme Spain-Portugal 0624_2IQBIONEURO_6_EHORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions No 101032481
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurological disorders have for a long time been a global challenge dismissed by drug companies, especially due to the low efficiency of most therapeutic compounds to cross the brain capillary wall, that forms the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and reach the brain. This has boosted an incessant search for novel carriers and methodologies to drive these compounds throughout the BBB. However, it remains a challenge to artificially mimic the physiology and function of the human BBB, allowing a reliable, reproducible and throughput screening of these rapidly growing technologies and nanoformulations (NFs). To surpass these challenges, brain-on-a-chip (BoC) - advanced microphysiological platforms that emulate key features of the brain composition and functionality, with the potential to emulate pathophysiological signatures of neurological disorders, are emerging as a microfluidic tool to screen new brain-targeting drugs, investigate neuropathogenesis and reach personalized medicine. In this review, the advance of BoC as a bioengineered screening tool of new brain-targeting drugs and NFs, enabling to decipher the intricate nanotechnology-biology interface is discussed. Firstly, the main challenges to model the brain are outlined, then, examples of BoC platforms to recapitulate the neurodegenerative diseases and screen NFs are summarized, emphasizing the current most promising nanotechnological-based drug delivery strategies and lastly, the integration of high-throughput screening biosensing systems as possible cutting-edge technologies for an end-use perspective is discussed as future perspective.

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierBrainLab-On-A-Chip DevicesNanotechnologyNeurodegenerative DiseasesAnimalsDrug Delivery SystemsHumansBlood-brain barrierBrain-on-a-chipNanomedicineNeurodegenerative diseases

Identifiers

PMID39294645
PMCPMC11409741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.