ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024
A simple modified technique for screw fixation of displaced intra-articular calcaneus fracture through a sinus tarsi approach: a comparison with plate fixation.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mini-Open-Assisted Screw Fixation for Displaced Intra-Articular Calcaneus Fractures: Three Case Reports of Patients With Good Postoperative Outcomes.Case reports in orthopedics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPlates and screws are frequently used for the fixation of displaced intra-articular calcaneus fracture (DIACF). In this study, we compared the outcomes of a modified screw fixation technique with plate fixation via a sinus tarsi approach (STA).
methodsA series of 187 DIACF patients who were treated via an STA using a plate fixation (n = 81) or a screw fixation (n = 106) were included. Screw fixation was done with two 2.7 mm screws and two 6.5 mm cannulated screws. Outcomes were evaluated radiographically and clinically. Clinical evaluations included pain assessment by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and functional assessment by the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) questionnaire and Foot Function Index (FFI).
resultsThe mean final VAS was smaller in the screw group (P = 0.01). The mean AOFAS and FFI scores were not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.17 and P = 0. 19, respectively). The mean improvement of Bohler's angle, but not the Gissane's angle, was significantly greater in the screw group (P = 0.014 and P = 0.09, respectively). The mean improvement of calcaneal length and height were not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.78 and P = 0.22, respectively). The hardware removal rate was 14.8% in the plate group and 3.8% in the screw group (P = 0.007).
conclusionThe modified screw fixation method provides lower pain, better radiographic outcome, and lower rate of hardware removal compared to plate fixation in the treatment of DIACF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.