Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39294609›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2024

Clinicopathological and prognostic features of colorectal mucinous adenocarcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xiao Wang, Haoran Wang, Haoqing He, Kai Lv, Wenguang Yuan, Jingbo Chen, Hui Yang

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiao WangDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Key Laboratory of Metabolism and Gastrointestinal Tumor, Key Laboratory of Laparoscopic Technology, Shandong Medicine and Health Key Laboratory of General Surgery, NO.16766 Jingshi Road, Jinan, 250000, Shandong, China.
Haoran WangDepartment of General Surgery, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China.
Haoqing HeDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Key Laboratory of Metabolism and Gastrointestinal Tumor, Key Laboratory of Laparoscopic Technology, Shandong Medicine and Health Key Laboratory of General Surgery, NO.16766 Jingshi Road, Jinan, 250000, Shandong, China.
Kai LvDepartment of General Surgery, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China.
Wenguang YuanDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Key Laboratory of Metabolism and Gastrointestinal Tumor, Key Laboratory of Laparoscopic Technology, Shandong Medicine and Health Key Laboratory of General Surgery, NO.16766 Jingshi Road, Jinan, 250000, Shandong, China.
Jingbo ChenDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Key Laboratory of Metabolism and Gastrointestinal Tumor, Key Laboratory of Laparoscopic Technology, Shandong Medicine and Health Key Laboratory of General Surgery, NO.16766 Jingshi Road, Jinan, 250000, Shandong, China. qychenjingbo@163.com.
Hui YangDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Key Laboratory of Metabolism and Gastrointestinal Tumor, Key Laboratory of Laparoscopic Technology, Shandong Medicine and Health Key Laboratory of General Surgery, NO.16766 Jingshi Road, Jinan, 250000, Shandong, China. yanghqfshospital@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany studies have explored the clinicopathological features and prognosis between colorectal mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) and adenocarcinoma (AC) and have given different results. This meta-analysis summarizes previous evidence and evaluates the clinicopathological and prognostic features of MAC relative to AC in colorectal cancers (CRCs).

methodsThe meta-analysis was conducted by searching the databases of PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WANFANG data, Embase, and Web of Science. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the clinicopathological and prognostic differences between MAC and AC.

resultsFifty-six studies involving 803157 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. The clinicopathological features of MAC were greatly different from AC, except for lymphatic invasion (OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.99-1.15, P = 0.09) and perineural invasion (OR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.79-1.06, P = 0.09). Further investigation found that MAC predicted poor OS (HR = 1.04, 95% CI: 1.03-1.04, P < 0.01), but not DFS in CRCs (HR = 1.01,95% CI: 0.88- 1.17, P = 0.85). Subgroup analysis found that MAC was obviously correlated with OS in patients with different recruitment time, with tumor located in rectum, from different regions, with different sample sizes and with TNM stage in II, and calculated by different data types(P < 0.01).

conclusionsThis study shows that MAC displays obviously different clinicopathological features compared with AC. And MAC has a poor OS relative to AC but the DFS was comparable.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma, MucinousColorectal NeoplasmsHumansNeoplasm StagingPrognosisCancerMucinous subtypeSurvival

Identifiers

PMID39294609
PMCPMC11411795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.