Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39294592›Full record

SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024

Live birth rate after oocyte donation in females diagnosed with turner syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Pegah Rashidian, Mohammadamin Parsaei, Shaghayegh Karami, Tayebe Sadat Sayafi Sharifi, Zahra Sadin, Seyyed Amirhossein Salehi

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pegah RashidianReproductive Health Research Center, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran. pegah.rashidian@rocketmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9167-9172
Mohammadamin ParsaeiBreastfeeding Research Center, Family Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Shaghayegh KaramiSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Tayebe Sadat Sayafi SharifiSchool of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Zahra SadinSchool of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Seyyed Amirhossein SalehiStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn enduring challenge for women diagnosed with Turner syndrome (TS) is infertility. Oocyte donation (OD) offers a chance of pregnancy for these patients. However, current data on pregnancy outcomes are inadequate. Hence, this systematic review aims to explore the clinical outcomes of OD in patients with TS.

methodsA systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Sciences, Scopus, and Embase for relevant papers from 1 January 1990 to 30 November 2023. Our primary research objective is to determine the live birth rate among women with TS who have undergone in vitro fertilization (IVF) using OD for fertility purposes. Specifically, we aim to calculate the pooled live birth rates per patient and per embryo transfer (ET) cycle. For secondary outcomes, we have analyzed the rates of clinical pregnancy achievement per ET cycle and the incidence of gestational hypertensive complications per clinical pregnancy. Prevalence meta-analyses were performed using STATA 18.0 by utilizing a random-effects model and calculating the pooled rates of each outcome using a 95% confidence interval (CI).

resultsA total of 14 studies encompassing 417 patients were systematically reviewed. Except for one prospective clinical trial and one prospective cohort study, all other 12 studies had a retrospective cohort design. Our meta-analysis has yielded a pooled live birth rate per patient of 40% (95% CI: 29-51%; 14 studies included) and a pooled live birth rate per ET cycle of 17% (95% CI: 13-20%; 13 studies included). Also, the pooled clinical pregnancy achievement rate per ET cycle was estimated at 31% (95% CI: 25-36%; 12 studies included). Moreover, the pooled rate of pregnancy-induced hypertensive disorders per clinical pregnancy was estimated at 12% (95% CI: 1-31%; 8 studies included). No publication bias was found across all analyses.

conclusionsThis study demonstrated promising pregnancy outcomes for OD in patients with TS. Further studies are essential to address not only the preferred techniques, but also the psychological, ethical, and societal implications of these complex procedures for these vulnerable populations.

trial registrationThis systematic review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under the registration code CRD42023494273.

Indexed as

Birth RateFertilization in VitroInfertility, FemaleLive BirthOocyte DonationTurner SyndromeEmbryo TransferFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePregnancy RateAssisted reproductive techniquesEmbryo transferLive birthOocyte donationTurner syndrome

Identifiers

PMID39294592
PMCPMC11411911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.