ArticleBMC bioinformatics2024
Leveraging gene correlations in single cell transcriptomic data.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differential expression analysis in single-cell and spatial RNA-seq without model assumptions.Cell reports methods · 2026Article
- Differential expression analysis in single cell and spatial RNASeq without model assumptions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Statistically principled feature selection for single cell transcriptomics.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Uncovering minimal pathways in melanoma initiation.Nature communications · 2025Article
- SciGeneX: enhancing transcriptional analysis through gene module detection in single-cell and spatial transcriptomics data.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Statistically principled feature selection for single cell transcriptomics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMany approaches have been developed to overcome technical noise in single cell RNA-sequencing (scRNAseq). As researchers dig deeper into data-looking for rare cell types, subtleties of cell states, and details of gene regulatory networks-there is a growing need for algorithms with controllable accuracy and fewer ad hoc parameters and thresholds. Impeding this goal is the fact that an appropriate null distribution for scRNAseq cannot simply be extracted from data in which ground truth about biological variation is unknown (i.e., usually).
resultsWe approach this problem analytically, assuming that scRNAseq data reflect only cell heterogeneity (what we seek to characterize), transcriptional noise (temporal fluctuations randomly distributed across cells), and sampling error (i.e., Poisson noise). We analyze scRNAseq data without normalization-a step that skews distributions, particularly for sparse data-and calculate p values associated with key statistics. We develop an improved method for selecting features for cell clustering and identifying gene-gene correlations, both positive and negative. Using simulated data, we show that this method, which we call BigSur (Basic Informatics and Gene Statistics from Unnormalized Reads), captures even weak yet significant correlation structures in scRNAseq data. Applying BigSur to data from a clonal human melanoma cell line, we identify thousands of correlations that, when clustered without supervision into gene communities, align with known cellular components and biological processes, and highlight potentially novel cell biological relationships.
conclusionsNew insights into functionally relevant gene regulatory networks can be obtained using a statistically grounded approach to the identification of gene-gene correlations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.