ArticleBMC genomics2024
Deconvolution from bulk gene expression by leveraging sample-wise and gene-wise similarities and single-cell RNA-Seq data.
Article in BMC genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating reference-mixture matching in cell-type deconvolution with single-cell RNA-seq references.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Models for Cancer Research: A Narrative Review of Bulk RNA-Seq Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Revolutionizing Implantation Studies: Uterine-Specific Models and Advanced Technologies.Biomolecules · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe widely adopted bulk RNA-seq measures the gene expression average of cells, masking cell type heterogeneity, which confounds downstream analyses. Therefore, identifying the cellular composition and cell type-specific gene expression profiles (GEPs) facilitates the study of the underlying mechanisms of various biological processes. Although single-cell RNA-seq focuses on cell type heterogeneity in gene expression, it requires specialized and expensive resources and currently is not practical for a large number of samples or a routine clinical setting. Recently, computational deconvolution methodologies have been developed, while many of them only estimate cell type composition or cell type-specific GEPs by requiring the other as input. The development of more accurate deconvolution methods to infer cell type abundance and cell type-specific GEPs is still essential.
resultsWe propose a new deconvolution algorithm, DSSC, which infers cell type-specific gene expression and cell type proportions of heterogeneous samples simultaneously by leveraging gene-gene and sample-sample similarities in bulk expression and single-cell RNA-seq data. Through comparisons with the other existing methods, we demonstrate that DSSC is effective in inferring both cell type proportions and cell type-specific GEPs across simulated pseudo-bulk data (including intra-dataset and inter-dataset simulations) and experimental bulk data (including mixture data and real experimental data). DSSC shows robustness to the change of marker gene number and sample size and also has cost and time efficiencies.
conclusionsDSSC provides a practical and promising alternative to the experimental techniques to characterize cellular composition and heterogeneity in the gene expression of heterogeneous samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.