ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2024
Cochlear Aqueduct Post-Natal Growth: A Computed Tomography Study.
Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cochlear Aqueduct Advection and Diffusion Inferred from Computed Tomography Imaging with a Bayesian Approach.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2026Article
- Treating Hearing Loss: From Cochlear Implantation to Gene Therapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Gene Therapy vs Cochlear Implantation in Restoring Hearing Function and Speech Perception for Individuals With Congenital Deafness.JAMA neurology · 2025Article
- The rise of cochlear gene therapy.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025Review
- The Blood-Labyrinth Barrier: Non-Invasive Delivery Strategies for Inner Ear Drug Delivery.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The cochlear aqueduct (CA) is a bony canal located at the base of the scala tympani of the cochlea. It connects the inner ear perilymph fluid to the cerebrospinal fluid of the posterior cerebral fossa. Its function is not well understood, as it seems to be patent in only a fraction of adult patients. Indirect observations argue in favor of the CA being more patent in children. To study the CA morphology in children, we performed a retrospective single-center study of 85 high-resolution temporal bone computed tomography (hrCT) scans of children with a mean age of 3.23 ± 3.07 years (13 days of life up to 18 years), and compared them with a group of 22 adult hrCT (mean age of 24.01 ± 3.58 years). The CA morphology measurements included its total length, its funnel (wider intracranial portion) length and width and its type (indicating its radiological patency), according to a previously published classification. The dimensions of the CA were significantly smaller in children compared with adults for the axial length (10.37 ± 2.58 versus 14.63 ± 2.40 mm, respectively, p < 0,001) and the funnel length (3.94 ± 1.59 versus 6.01 ± 1.77 mm, respectively, p < 0,001). The funnel width tended to be smaller but the difference was not significant: 3.49 ± 1,33 versus 3.89 ± 1.07 mm, p = 0,22. The repartition of types of CA was also statistically different. The CA appeared to be more identifiable in the children population. Type 1 (CA visible along its entire course) accounted for 42% (36/85) of children and only 5% (1/22) of adults, type 2 (visible in the medial two thirds) for 30% (25/85) versus 31% (7/22), type 3 (not visible completely along the medial two thirds) for 27% (23/85) versus 50% (11/22). Finally, type 4 (undetectable) was found in only 1% (1/85) of children and 14% (3/22) of adults (p < 0,001). Our study showed significant postnatal growth of the length of the CA, which was more rapid before the age of 2, and slowed after 6 years of age. Its width increased less, with children older than 2 years presenting a similar width to adults. The CA was more identifiable in hrCT in children, arguing for a more permeable tract. The number of completely ossified CA was significantly lower in the children population. These findings highlight the differences between the CA morphology in adults and children and raise the question of differences in function. Moreover, these differences may impact the pharmacodynamics of drugs or vectors delivered into the pediatric inner ear. Further studies are required, both on the anatomy of temporal bones and on the function of the CA in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.