Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39294451›Full record

ReviewCurrent allergy and asthma reports2024

Getting in Shape: Updates in Exercise Anaphylaxis.

Annette Carlisle, Jay Adam Lieberman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Annette CarlisleDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pulmonology, Allergy & Immunology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, LeBonheur Children's Hospital, 51 N. Dunlap Street, Suite 400, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA. acarlis3@uthsc.edu.
Jay Adam LiebermanDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pulmonology, Allergy & Immunology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, LeBonheur Children's Hospital, 51 N. Dunlap Street, Suite 400, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewExercise induced anaphylaxis (EIA) can be difficult to diagnose due to the interplay of co-factors on clinical presentation and the lack of standardized, confirmatory testing. RECENT

findingsEIA has been historically categorized as either food-independent or food-dependent. However, recent literature has suggested that perhaps EIA is more complex given the relationship between not only food on EIA but other various co-factors such as medications and alcohol ingestion that are either required to elicit symptoms in EIA or make symptoms worse. For the practicing clinician, understanding how these co-factors can be implicated in EIA can enable one to take a more personalized approach in treating patients with EIA and thus improve quality of life for patients.

Indexed as

AnaphylaxisExerciseFood HypersensitivityHumansQuality of LifeAnaphylaxisCofactorExerciseFood-inducedWheat allergy

Identifiers

PMID39294451
PMCPMC11464536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.