Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39294417›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025

Intra-Individual Reproducibility of Automated Abdominal Organ Segmentation-Performance of TotalSegmentator Compared to Human Readers and an Independent nnU-Net Model.

Lorraine Abel, Jakob Wasserthal, Manfred T Meyer, Jan Vosshenrich, Shan Yang, Ricardo Donners, Markus Obmann, Daniel Boll, Elmar Merkle, Hanns-Christian Breit and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lorraine Abel *Department of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Jakob Wasserthal *Department of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Manfred T MeyerDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Jan VosshenrichDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Shan YangDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Ricardo DonnersDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Markus ObmannDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Daniel BollDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Elmar MerkleDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Hanns-Christian BreitDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Martin SegerothDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland. martin.segeroth@usb.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7820-2778

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to assess segmentation reproducibility of artificial intelligence-based algorithm, TotalSegmentator, across 34 anatomical structures using multiphasic abdominal CT scans comparing unenhanced, arterial, and portal venous phases in the same patients. A total of 1252 multiphasic abdominal CT scans acquired at our institution between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2022, were retrospectively included. TotalSegmentator was used to derive volumetric measurements of 34 abdominal organs and structures from the total of 3756 CT series. Reproducibility was evaluated across three contrast phases per CT and compared to two human readers and an independent nnU-Net trained on the BTCV dataset. Relative deviation in segmented volumes and absolute volume deviations (AVD) were reported. Volume deviation within 5% was considered reproducible. Thus, non-inferiority testing was conducted using a 5% margin. Twenty-nine out of 34 structures had volume deviations within 5% and were considered reproducible. Volume deviations for the adrenal glands, gallbladder, spleen, and duodenum were above 5%. Highest reproducibility was observed for bones (- 0.58% [95% CI: - 0.58, - 0.57]) and muscles (- 0.33% [- 0.35, - 0.32]). Among abdominal organs, volume deviation was 1.67% (1.60, 1.74). TotalSegmentator outperformed the reproducibility of the nnU-Net trained on the BTCV dataset with an AVD of 6.50% (6.41, 6.59) vs. 10.03% (9.86, 10.20; p < 0.0001), most notably in cases with pathologic findings. Similarly, TotalSegmentator's AVD between different contrast phases was superior compared to the interreader AVD for the same contrast phase (p = 0.036). TotalSegmentator demonstrated high intra-individual reproducibility for most abdominal structures in multiphasic abdominal CT scans. Although reproducibility was lower in pathologic cases, it outperforms both human readers and a nnU-Net trained on the BTCV dataset.

Indexed as

AbdomenRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRadiography, AbdominalTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesCTNeural networksReproducibilitySegmentation

Identifiers

PMID39294417
PMCPMC12092311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.