Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39294403›Full record

ReviewNature ecology & evolution2024

Growth rate as a link between microbial diversity and soil biogeochemistry.

Megan M Foley, Bram W G Stone, Tristan A Caro, Noah W Sokol, Benjamin J Koch, Steven J Blazewicz, Paul Dijkstra, Michaela Hayer, Kirsten Hofmockel, Brianna K Finley and 11 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature ecology & evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A genomic view of Earth's biomes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Codon bias, nucleotide selection, and genome size predict in situ bacterial growth rate and transcription in rewetted soil.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  15. Ecology and functions ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Megan M FoleyCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA. mmf289@nau.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4055-8303
Bram W G StoneEarth and Biological Sciences Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3976-4775
Tristan A CaroDepartment of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6177-7444
Noah W SokolPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0239-1976
Benjamin J KochCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1914-7681
Steven J BlazewiczPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7517-1750
Paul DijkstraCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
Michaela HayerCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7284-788X
Kirsten HofmockelEarth and Biological Sciences Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1586-2167
Brianna K FinleyDepartment of Ecology, Earth and Environmental Sciences Area, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Michelle MackCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
Jane MarksCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
Rebecca L MauCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
Victoria Monsaint-QueeneyCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
Ember MorrisseyDivision of Plant and Soil Sciences, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5810-1096
Jeffrey PropsterCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
Alicia PurcellCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4778-4717
Egbert SchwartzCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
Jennifer Pett-RidgePhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4439-2398
Noah FiererDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA.
Bruce A HungateCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7337-1887

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) 1643871National Science Foundation (NSF) 2114570National Science Foundation (NSF) AW5809-826664U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) DE-SC0020172U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) DE-SC0023126U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) LLNL 'Microbes Persist' Soil Microbiome Scientific Focus Area SCW1632U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) SC0016207U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Science Graduate Student ResearchU.S. Department of Energy (DOE) SCW1632
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measuring the growth rate of a microorganism is a simple yet profound way to quantify its effect on the world. The absolute growth rate of a microbial population reflects rates of resource assimilation, biomass production and element transformation-some of the many ways in which organisms affect Earth's ecosystems and climate. Microbial fitness in the environment depends on the ability to reproduce quickly when conditions are favourable and adopt a survival physiology when conditions worsen, which cells coordinate by adjusting their relative growth rate. At the population level, relative growth rate is a sensitive metric of fitness, linking survival and reproduction to the ecology and evolution of populations. Techniques combining omics and stable isotope probing enable sensitive measurements of the growth rates of microbial assemblages and individual taxa in soil. Microbial ecologists can explore how the growth rates of taxa with known traits and evolutionary histories respond to changes in resource availability, environmental conditions and interactions with other organisms. We anticipate that quantitative and scalable data on the growth rates of soil microorganisms, coupled with measurements of biogeochemical fluxes, will allow scientists to test and refine ecological theory and advance process-based models of carbon flux, nutrient uptake and ecosystem productivity. Measurements of in situ microbial growth rates provide insights into the ecology of populations and can be used to quantitatively link microbial diversity to soil biogeochemistry.

Indexed as

Soil MicrobiologyBacteriaBiodiversityEcosystemMicrobiotaSoilSoil

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.