ArticleScientific reports2024
Collaborative weighting in federated graph neural networks for disease classification with the human-in-the-loop.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incentive mechanism of foundation model enabled cross-silo federated learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Privacy-preserving federated learning for collaborative medical data mining in multi-institutional settings.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The authors introduce a novel framework that integrates federated learning with Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to classify diseases, incorporating Human-in-the-Loop methodologies. This advanced framework innovatively employs collaborative voting mechanisms on subgraphs within a Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) network, situated in a federated ensemble-based deep learning context. This methodological approach marks a significant stride in the development of explainable and privacy-aware Artificial Intelligence, significantly contributing to the progression of personalized digital medicine in a responsible and transparent manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.