Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39294269›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Vertical transfer of gut microbiota from dam to neonate calf in the early of life.

Viviani Gomes, Christian Hoffmann, Daniela Irlanda Castro-Tardón, Fernanda Carolina Ramos Dos Santos, Susan Suárez-Retamozo, David John Hurley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Viviani GomesDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cidade Universitária, 87, Prof. Dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva Avenue, Butantã, São Paulo, 05508-270, Brazil. viviani.gomes@usp.br.
Christian HoffmannDepartment of Food Sciences and Experimental Nutrition, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Daniela Irlanda Castro-TardónDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cidade Universitária, 87, Prof. Dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva Avenue, Butantã, São Paulo, 05508-270, Brazil.
Fernanda Carolina Ramos Dos SantosDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cidade Universitária, 87, Prof. Dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva Avenue, Butantã, São Paulo, 05508-270, Brazil.
Susan Suárez-RetamozoFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
David John HurleyFood Animal Health and Management Program, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo Process number 2016/16748-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the vertical transfer of microbiota from dams to the offspring. We studied a pair of 20 dams and its offspring. Maternal sources (colostrum, feces and vaginal secretion) and newborn fecal samples were analyzed using 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing on days 1, 3, 7, 14 and 28. Overall, newborns were maintained healthy and did not receive antimicrobial therapy. The Source Tracker analysis indicated that the newborn fecal microbiota was similar to colostrum and vaginal secretion from day 1 up to 7. However, an unknown source (probably from the environment) showed a gradual increase in its similarity with fecal samples from calves measured from day 3 to 28. The most abundant bacteria groups on meconium (day 1) and calf fecal samples on day 3 were Escherichia-Shigella and Clostridium, respectively. On day 7, the predominant genus were Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus, while Fusobacterium was the most abundant genus on day 14, coinciding with the diarrhea peak. Faecalibacterium showed a gradual increase throughout the neonatal period. Maternal sources contribute to the neonatal microbiota, however other unknown sources (probably environment) had a strong influence on development of the gut microbiota later in the neonate period.

Indexed as

Animals, NewbornColostrumFecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBacteriaCattleFemaleMeconiumPregnancyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SVaginaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDiversityEarly-life eventsKeystone taxaMicrobiomeNewborn

Identifiers

PMID39294269
PMCPMC11411070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.