Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39294218›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Susceptibility assessment of multi-hazards using random forest-back propagation neural network coupling model: a Hangzhou city case study.

Bofan Yu, Huaixue Xing, Jiaxing Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bofan YuChina Geological Survey Nanjing Center, Nanjing, 210016, People's Republic of China.
Huaixue XingChina Geological Survey Nanjing Center, Nanjing, 210016, People's Republic of China. 57670204@qq.com.
Jiaxing YanChina University of Geosciences (Wuhan), The Institute of Geological Survey of China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan, 430074, People's Republic of China.

Funding

Laboratory of Geological Safety of Underground Space in Coastal Cities, Ministry of Natural Resources Project No. BHKF2022Z02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the demand for regional geological disaster risk assessments in large cities continues to rise, our study selected Hangzhou, one of China's megacities, as a model to evaluate the susceptibility to two major geological hazards in the region: ground collapse and ground subsidence. Given that susceptibility assessments for such disasters mainly rely on knowledge-driven models, and data-driven models have significant potential for application, we proposed a high-accuracy Random Forest-Back Propagation Neural Network Coupling Model. By using nine evaluation factors selected based on field surveys and expert recommendations, along with disaster data, the model's predictive results indicate a 3-40% improvement in model performance metrics such as AUC, accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score, compared to single models and traditional SVM and logistic regression models. Ultimately, using the predictive results of this model, we created susceptibility maps for individual disasters and developed a muti-hazards susceptibility map by employing the expert weight discrimination method and the overlay evaluation method. Furthermore, we discussed the feature importance in the prediction process. Our study validated the feasibility of using advanced machine learning models for urban geological disaster assessment, providing a replicable template for other cities.

Identifiers

PMID39294218
PMCPMC11410961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.