ArticleScientific reports2024
Robust quantitative X-ray phase diagnostic for carbon composite characterisation in the context of lightning induced risk.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- On the optimization of the geometric pattern for structured illumination based X-ray phase contrast and dark-field imaging: a simulation study and its experimental validation.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Getting complementary physical information from a single image acquisition is particularly valuable for materials analysis. Grating based X-ray Phase Contrast Imaging (XPCI) methods allow decoupling attenuation, phase and scattering information. However, the phase and scattering extraction processes can easily suffer from artefacts, which is detrimental to implement this imaging technique in societal applications. In this paper, we demonstrate that grating based XPCI can provide a robust phase measurement in complex materials such as damaged composites. The technique allows the phase to be analysed using a self-assessment method that first identifies the artefacts from the imaging setup, and then can be used as an indicator to interpret the signal from a material. We focus on carbon fibre reinforced polymers which we subjected to laboratory-controlled lightning strikes. We evidence that the combined information from phase and attenuation allow identifying the type of defect induced by the lightning current. The phase information is converted into relative mass density variation within the sample and depicts areas with a loss in density up to 40%. We ensure that these results are valid by comparing them with an X-ray attenuation contrast tomographic reconstruction.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.