Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39294206›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

The early prognostic value of the 1-4-day BCM/PA trend after admission in neurocritical patients.

Jingjing Peng, Yanling Xiang, Guangwei Liu, Shuya Ling, Feng Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jingjing Peng *Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Yanling Xiang *Department of Operation Anaesthesia, University-Town Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Guangwei LiuDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Shuya LingDepartment of Internal Medicine-Cardiovascular Department, The First Branch of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, People's Republic of China.
Feng LiDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China. 204267@hospital.cqmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate early stage dynamic changes in relevant indicators in neurocritical patients to identify biomarkers that can predict a poor prognosis at an early stage (1-4 days after admission). This study retrospectively collected clinical data, inflammatory indicators, and nutritional indicators from 77 patients at the neurology intensive care unit. The 3-month modified Rankin scale score was used as the outcome indicator. A linear mixed model was used to analyze changes in inflammatory indicators and nutritional indicators in neurocritical patients over time from 1-4 days after admission. Logistic regression was used to determine the independent risk factors for a poor prognosis in neurocritical patients and to construct a predictive model. The predictive efficacy of the model was verified using leave-one-out cross-validation and decision curve analysis methods. The analysis results showed that 1-4 days after admission, the inflammatory indicators of white blood cell and absolute monocyte counts and the nutritional indicators of body cell mass(BCM), fat-free mass, body cell mass/phase angle (BCM/PA), intracellular water, extracellular water, and skeletal muscle index increased overall, while the nutritional indicators of albumin and visceral fat area decreased overall. The logistic multivariate regression model showed that the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) (odds ratio (OR) = 2.526, 95% CI [1.202, 5.308]), hemoglobin (Hb)(on admission)-Hb(min) (OR = 1.049, 95% CI [1.015, 1.083), BCM(on admission) (OR = 0.794, 95% CI [0.662, 0.952]), and the change in BCM/PA 1-4 days after admission (OR = 1.157, 95% CI [1.070, 1.252]) were independent risk factors for a poor prognosis in neurocritical patients. The predictive analysis showed that the predictive power of Model 1 with BCM/PA (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.95, 95% CI (0.90, 0.99)) was 93%, 65%, 141%, and 133% higher than that of Model 2 without BCM/PA, the CCI, the APACHE II score, and the NRS2002 score (all P < 0.05), respectively. The CCI, Hb(on admission)-Hb(min), BCM(on admission), and an increase in BCM/PA 1-4 days after admission were independently associated with a poor prognosis in neurocritical patients. Of these variables, BCM/PA may be a valid indicator for early stage prediction of a poor prognosis in neurocritical patients.

Indexed as

BiomarkersAdultAgedFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPatient AdmissionPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsBiomarkersBioelectrical impedanceBiomarkersModified Rankin ScaleNeurocritical patientSystemic inflammatory response syndrome

Identifiers

PMID39294206
PMCPMC11410815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.