ArticleScientific reports2024
"Eco-friendly HPLC method for analysis of dipyrone and hyoscine in different matrices with biomonitoring".
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A selective, precise, and accurate reversed HPLC method has been developed and validated for simultaneous separation and determination of two veterinary drugs, dipyrone and hyoscine, in their combined dosage form in the presence of their official impurities, namely 4-aminoantipyrine and tropic acid, in addition to the formulated preservative: phenol. The linearity range was found to be (1.00-35.00 µg/mL) for dipyrone and (2.50-50.00 µg/mL) for hyoscine. It exhibited a satisfactory linearity regression R (0.9999) for both drugs with LOD 0.22 µg/mL and 0.72 µg/mL and LOQ 0.65 µg/mL and 2.19 µg/mL for dipyrone and hyoscine, respectively. Additionally, the two cited drugs were also determined in the presence of dipyrone active metabolite 4-aminoantipyrine using diclofenac as an internal standard in bovine urine. The linearity range was found to be (15-75 µg/mL) for dipyrone, (2.5-60 µg/mL) for hyoscine, and (2.5-60 µg/mL) for 4-aminoantipyrine with linearity regression R (0.9999-0.9998). The LLOQ (15, 2.5, 2.5 µg/mL), LQC (45, 7.5, 7.5 µg/mL), MQC (55, 25, 25 µg/mL), and HQC (60, 50 50 µg/mL) were determined for dipyrone, hyoscine and 4-aminoantipyrine, respectively. UV detection was carried out at 220 nm. The method was validated according to the ICH guidelines, as well as according to FDA guidelines for determining both drugs in bioanalytical matrices and both proved accuracy and precision. A statistical comparison was made between the results obtained and those obtained by the reported method, showing no significant difference in accuracy and precision at p = 0.05. The suggested method was proved eco-friendly through a greenness assessment using two different tools (The analytical eco-scale scored 83, and the AGREE-Analytical Greenness Metric approach scored 0.83). The suggested method can be used in the routine work of quality control labs, screening for drug abuse, and ensuring clean sport for horse racing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.