Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39294145›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Deep generative models of protein structure uncover distant relationships across a continuous fold space.

Eli J Draizen, Stella Veretnik, Cameron Mura, Philip E Bourne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eli J DraizenSchool of Data Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. edraizen@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5645-5050
Stella VeretnikSchool of Data Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6222-7281
Cameron MuraSchool of Data Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. cmura@virginia.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7985-2561
Philip E BourneSchool of Data Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7618-7292

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) MCB-1350957
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our views of fold space implicitly rest upon many assumptions that impact how we analyze, interpret and understand protein structure, function and evolution. For instance, is there an optimal granularity in viewing protein structural similarities (e.g., architecture, topology or some other level)? Similarly, the discrete/continuous dichotomy of fold space is central, but remains unresolved. Discrete views of fold space bin similar folds into distinct, non-overlapping groups; unfortunately, such binning can miss remote relationships. While hierarchical systems like CATH are indispensable resources, less heuristic and more conceptually flexible approaches could enable more nuanced explorations of fold space. Building upon an Urfold model of protein structure, here we present a deep generative modeling framework, termed DeepUrfold, for analyzing protein relationships at scale. DeepUrfold's learned embeddings occupy high-dimensional latent spaces that can be distilled for a given protein in terms of an amalgamated representation uniting sequence, structure and biophysical properties. This approach is structure-guided, versus being purely structure-based, and DeepUrfold learns representations that, in a sense, define superfamilies. Deploying DeepUrfold with CATH reveals evolutionarily-remote relationships that evade existing methodologies, and suggests a mostly-continuous view of fold space-a view that extends beyond simple geometric similarity, towards the realm of integrated sequence ↔ structure ↔ function properties.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularProtein FoldingProteinsAlgorithmsComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinDeep LearningProtein ConformationProteins

Identifiers

PMID39294145
PMCPMC11410806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.