Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39294144›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Machine learning the electric field response of condensed phase systems using perturbed neural network potentials.

Kit Joll, Philipp Schienbein, Kevin M Rosso, Jochen Blumberger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Simultaneous learning of static and dynamic charges.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kit JollDepartment of Physics and Astronomy and Thomas Young Centre, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-3877-0616
Philipp SchienbeinDepartment of Physics and Astronomy and Thomas Young Centre, University College London, London, UK. p.schienbein@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2417-1472
Kevin M RossoPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8474-7720
Jochen BlumbergerDepartment of Physics and Astronomy and Thomas Young Centre, University College London, London, UK. j.blumberger@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1546-6765

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interaction of condensed phase systems with external electric fields is of major importance in a myriad of processes in nature and technology, ranging from the field-directed motion of cells (galvanotaxis), to geochemistry and the formation of ice phases on planets, to field-directed chemical catalysis and energy storage and conversion systems including supercapacitors, batteries and solar cells. Molecular simulation in the presence of electric fields would give important atomistic insight into these processes but applications of the most accurate methods such as ab-initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) are limited in scope by their computational expense. Here we introduce Perturbed Neural Network Potential Molecular Dynamics (PNNP MD) to push back the accessible time and length scales of such simulations. We demonstrate that important dielectric properties of liquid water including the field-induced relaxation dynamics, the dielectric constant and the field-dependent IR spectrum can be machine learned up to surprisingly high field strengths of about 0.2 V Å

Identifiers

PMID39294144
PMCPMC11411082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.