Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39294142›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Computing high-degree polynomial gradients in memory.

Tinish Bhattacharya, George H Hutchinson, Giacomo Pedretti, Xia Sheng, Jim Ignowski, Thomas Van Vaerenbergh, Ray Beausoleil, John Paul Strachan, Dmitri B Strukov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tinish BhattacharyaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA. tinish@ucsb.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4591-6277
George H HutchinsonDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-2150-987X
Giacomo PedrettiArtificial Intelligence Research Lab, Hewlett Packard Labs, Milpitas, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4501-8672
Xia ShengArtificial Intelligence Research Lab, Hewlett Packard Labs, Milpitas, CA, USA.
Jim IgnowskiArtificial Intelligence Research Lab, Hewlett Packard Labs, Fort Collins, CO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5091-3674
Thomas Van VaerenberghLarge Scale Integrated Photonics Lab, Hewlett Packard Labs, Milpitas, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7301-8610
Ray BeausoleilLarge Scale Integrated Photonics Lab, Hewlett Packard Labs, Milpitas, CA, USA.
John Paul StrachanInstitute for Neuromorphic Compute Nodes (PGI-14), Peter Grunberg Institute, Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH, Juelich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1382-3677
Dmitri B StrukovDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA. strukov@ece.ucsb.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4526-4347

Funding

United States Department of Defense | Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) FA8650-23-3-7313
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Specialized function gradient computing hardware could greatly improve the performance of state-of-the-art optimization algorithms. Prior work on such hardware, performed in the context of Ising Machines and related concepts, is limited to quadratic polynomials and not scalable to commonly used higher-order functions. Here, we propose an approach for massively parallel gradient calculations of high-degree polynomials, which is conducive to efficient mixed-signal in-memory computing circuit implementations and whose area scales proportionally with the product of the number of variables and terms in the function and, most importantly, independent of its degree. Two flavors of such an approach are proposed. The first is limited to binary-variable polynomials typical in combinatorial optimization problems, while the second type is broader at the cost of a more complex periphery. To validate the former approach, we experimentally demonstrated solving a small-scale third-order Boolean satisfiability problem based on integrated metal-oxide memristor crossbar circuits, with competitive heuristics algorithm. Simulation results for larger-scale, more practical problems show orders of magnitude improvements in area, speed and energy efficiency compared to the state-of-the-art. We discuss how our work could enable even higher-performance systems after co-designing algorithms to exploit massively parallel gradient computation.

Identifiers

PMID39294142
PMCPMC11411077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.