ArticleNature communications2024
Complex trait associations in rare diseases and impacts on Mendelian variant interpretation.
Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterization of NAT2 Using Long-Read Sequencing: Allele, Diplotype, and Phenotype Call Accuracy Compared to Other Testing Strategies.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Decomposing the genetic risk of autism spectrum disorder into discrete molecular subtypes underlie clinical heterogeneity based on transcriptome profile.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Reframing AI for Rare Disease Recognition.Research square · 2026Article
- GEN-KnowRD: Reframing AI for Rare Disease Recognition.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Vitamin D Receptor (VDR) Polymorphisms and Cardiometabolic Profiles in Orthopedic Patients: A Cluster-Based Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Genetic contribution to severe COVID-19 in adults under 60 years without major comorbidities in the German National Pandemic Cohort Network (NAPKON).Human genomics · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Pediatric Rare Diseases: From Real-World Data Toward a Personalized Medicine Approach.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Toward clinical long-read genome sequencing for rare diseases.Nature genetics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Emerging evidence implicates common genetic variation - aggregated into polygenic scores (PGS) - in the onset and phenotypic presentation of rare diseases. Here, we comprehensively map individual polygenic liability for 1102 open-source PGS in a cohort of 3059 probands enrolled in the Genomic Answers for Kids (GA4K) rare disease study, revealing widespread associations between rare disease phenotypes and PGSs for common complex diseases and traits, blood protein levels, and brain and other organ morphological measurements. Using this resource, we demonstrate increased polygenic liability in probands with an inherited candidate disease variant (VUS) compared to unaffected carrier parents. Further, we show an enrichment for large-effect rare variants in putative core PGS genes for associated complex traits. Overall, our study supports and expands on previous findings of complex trait associations in rare diseases, implicates polygenic liability as a potential mechanism underlying variable penetrance of candidate causal variants, and provides a framework for identifying novel candidate rare disease genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.