ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2025
Survey on Awareness and Implementation Rate of Ultrasound Elastography and Attenuation Imaging.
Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective Recent developments in ultrasound elastography (UE) and ultrasound attenuation imaging (UA) have enabled the detection of advanced liver fibrosis and steatosis in patients with steatotic liver disease (SLD), which is prevalent worldwide. In patients with SLD, the presence of advanced liver fibrosis determines the risk of hepatocarcinogenesis, and UE and UA are expected to play important roles in liver cancer surveillance. We conducted a questionnaire survey among medical facilities in Saga Prefecture regarding the actual status of awareness and implementation of UE and UA. Methods A 16-item questionnaire was sent to 275 facilities that employed members of the Liver Cancer Control Medical Association in Saga Prefecture. The response rate was 56% (153 facilities), and data from 142 facilities were analyzed after excluding 11 facilities. Results The most common facilities were outpatient clinics (60%) followed by hospitals with ≥100 beds (14%). In 48% of the facilities, an average of 10-49 abdominal ultrasound examinations were performed monthly. The rates of recognition that UE and UA are useful for fibrosis and steatosis were 65% (92/142) and 41% (58/142), respectively. The actual availability of UE and UA in facilities with ultrasound machines was 21% (30/142) and 12% (17/142), respectively; UE and UA were used in 90% (27/30) and 88% (15/17) of these facilities, respectively. Conclusion Even among medical facilities in Saga Prefecture that are active in liver cancer surveillance, awareness of UE and UA is not high. The availability of UE and UA may be inadequate, considering the high prevalence of SLD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.