ArticleRadiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology2024
A multi-institutional study to investigate the sparing effect after whole brain electron FLASH in mice: Reproducibility and temporal evolution of functional, electrophysiological, and neurogenic endpoints.
Article in Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sustained AMPAR expression in CA3 neurons may mediate neuroprotection following FLASH-RT.Cell reports · 2026Article
- For ultra-high dose rate carbon-ion irradiation, comparable beam parameters induce the equivalent cell sparing (FLASH) effect.Journal of radiation research · 2026Article
- Volumetric FLASH dosimetryPhysics in medicine and biology · 2026Article
- FLASH Radiotherapy and Organelle-Targeted Radiosensitization in Glioblastoma: A Conceptual and Translational Review.Cancers · 2026Review
- Neuroprotection following FLASH-RT may be mediated by sustained glutamate receptor AMPAR activation in CA3 neurons.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Microenvironmental remodeling in FLASH radiotherapy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- The potential and risks of FLASH radiotherapy in pediatric patients.Neuro-oncology pediatrics · 2026Review
- Seeing the invisible: In vivo dosimetry in radiotherapy with radiacoustic IMAGING.Medical physics · 2025Review
- Factors Influencing the Biological Effects of FLASH Irradiation.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Effects and potential mechanisms of the ultra-high dose rate radiotherapy on lung injury: a review.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025Review
- Tissue-Cultured Chondrocytes Survive After Irradiation in 1300 Gy Dose.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- FLASH radiotherapy at a crossroads: a bibliometric perspective on progress and challenges.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- FLASH radiotherapy spares lymphocytes in tumor-draining lymph nodes and increases infiltration of immune cells in tumors.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of FLASH vs. Conventional Dose Rate Radiotherapy in a Model of Orthotopic, Murine Breast Cancer.Cancers · 2025Article
- Influence factor and mechanism of FLASH effect.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Navigating the Critical Translational Questions for Implementing FLASH in the Clinic.Seminars in radiation oncology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeUltra-high dose-rate radiotherapy (FLASH) has been shown to mitigate normal tissue toxicities associated with conventional dose rate radiotherapy (CONV) without compromising tumor killing in preclinical models. A prominent challenge in preclinical radiation research, including FLASH, is validating both the physical dosimetry and the biological effects across multiple institutions. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe previously demonstrated dosimetric reproducibility of two different electron FLASH devices at separate institutions using standardized phantoms and dosimeters. In this study, tumor-free adult female mice were given 10 Gy whole brain FLASH and CONV irradiation at both institutions and evaluated for the reproducibility and temporal evolution of multiple neurobiological endpoints.
resultsFLASH sparing of behavioral performance on novel object recognition (4 months post-irradiation) and of electrophysiologic long-term potentiation (LTP, 5 months post-irradiation) was reproduced between institutions. Differences between FLASH and CONV on the endpoints of hippocampal neurogenesis (Sox2, doublecortin), neuroinflammation (microglial activation), and electrophysiology (LTP) were not observed at early times (48 h to 2 weeks), but recovery of immature neurons by 3 weeks was greater with FLASH.
conclusionIn summary, we demonstrated reproducible FLASH sparing effects on the brain between two different beams at two different institutions with validated dosimetry. FLASH sparing effects on the endpoints evaluated manifested at later but not the earliest time points.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.