Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39293407›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2024

Training of Field-Workers for Rapid Assessment of Scabies Prevalence: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study in Mozambique.

Joanna Furnival-Adams, Valeria López, Hansel Mundaca, Amelia Houana, Antonio Macucha, Eldo Elobolobo, Aida Xerinda, Humberto Munguambe, Felisbela Materula, Regina Rabinovich and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Joanna Furnival-AdamsISGlobal, Barcelona Institute for Global Health, Barcelona, Spain.
Valeria LópezUniversidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas, Venezuela.
Hansel MundacaISGlobal, Barcelona Institute for Global Health, Barcelona, Spain.
Amelia HouanaCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Mopeia, Mozambique.
Antonio MacuchaCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Mopeia, Mozambique.
Eldo EloboloboCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Mopeia, Mozambique.
Aida XerindaCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Mopeia, Mozambique.
Humberto MunguambeCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Mopeia, Mozambique.
Felisbela MaterulaCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Mopeia, Mozambique.
Regina RabinovichISGlobal, Barcelona Institute for Global Health, Barcelona, Spain.
Francisco SauteCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Mopeia, Mozambique.
Daniel EngelmanTropical Diseases, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Carlos ChaccourISGlobal, Barcelona Institute for Global Health, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scabies is endemic in many resource-poor tropical areas, causing significant morbidity. However, our understanding of the true burden of scabies in Africa is limited, partly owing to limited capacity and challenges accessing the currently recommended diagnostic tools. The primary objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of scabies assessments made by minimally trained field-workers. We trained field-workers with a minimum of secondary school education in the diagnosis of scabies. After the training, we assessed the diagnostic accuracy of assessments made by nine field-workers compared with the reference standard. In all, 193 individuals were assessed for scabies. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated, as well as agreement (κ coefficients) between medical doctors and between field-workers. Of the 193 participants, 26% had scabies according to the reference standard. The sensitivity of field-worker diagnosis compared with the reference standard was 94% (95% CI: 90-99%), and the specificity was 96% (95% CI: 90-97%). The determination of severity by field-workers was less accurate; the sensitivity for severe scabies was 61% (95% CI: 48-74%), and the mean specificity was 97% (95% CI: 93-100%). This study demonstrated that field-workers without medical qualifications were capable of diagnosing scabies to a similar level of accuracy as experienced medical doctors after a short period of focal training. This may facilitate rapid assessments of scabies prevalence for public health purposes and decisions about mass drug administration implementation in similar settings.

Indexed as

ScabiesSensitivity and SpecificityAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMozambiquePrevalence

Identifiers

PMID39293407
PMCPMC11619491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.