Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39293083›Full record

Trial reportBlood advances2024

Magrolimab plus rituximab with or without chemotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Joseph E Maakaron, Adam Asch, Leslie Popplewell, Graham P Collins, Ian W Flinn, Nilanjan Ghosh, Colm Keane, Matthew Ku, Amitkumar Mehta, Mark Roschewski and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Blood advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02953509 (A Phase 1b/2 Trial of Hu5F9-G4 in Combination With Rituximab or Rituximab + Chemotherapy in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory B-cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02953509 phase1 / phase2terminatednot on this map

A Phase 1b/2 Trial of Hu5F9-G4 in Combination With Rituximab or Rituximab + Chemotherapy in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory B-cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorGilead SciencesRan2016 to 2024Enrolled178ConditionsNon Hodgkin LymphomaArmsMagrolimab, Rituximab, Gemcitabine, Oxaliplatin, Allopurinol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Antibody Therapy for Patients with Lymphoid Malignancies: Past and Present.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Joseph E MaakaronDivision of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Adam AschHematology/Oncology Section, Department of Medicine, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK.
Leslie PopplewellDepartment of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, CA.
Graham P CollinsDepartment of Haematology, Oxford Cancer and Haematology Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals National Health System Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Ian W FlinnMedical Oncology, Center for Blood Cancers, Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN.ORCID 0000-0001-6724-290X
Nilanjan GhoshDepartment of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders, Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Charlotte, NC.ORCID 0000-0002-3848-6136
Colm KeaneDepartment of Haematology, Princess Alexandra Hospital and Frazer Institute, Translational Research Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Matthew KuDepartment of Haematology, St. Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9289-1335
Amitkumar MehtaDivision of Hematology and Oncology, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL.ORCID 0000-0003-0537-4207
Mark RoschewskiLymphoid Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.ORCID 0000-0003-0278-2635
Gal Hacohen-KleimanGilead Sciences, Inc, Foster City, CA.
Yanan HuoGilead Sciences, Inc, Foster City, CA.
Yi ZhangGilead Sciences, Inc, Foster City, CA.ORCID 0000-0003-1878-343X
Camille RenardGilead Sciences, Inc, Foster City, CA.
Sonali M SmithDepartment of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.ORCID 0000-0002-9893-4949
Ranjana AdvaniDepartment of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractPatients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) ineligible for available salvage therapies have limited options for long-term disease control, necessitating novel treatments. Previously, magrolimab (anti-cluster-of-differentiation-47 antibody) plus rituximab (M+R) demonstrated ability to induce complete responses (CR) in R/R DLBCL. Here, we report 3-year follow-up data from this phase 1b/2 study assessing long-term safety and efficacy of M+R, and initial safety and efficacy of M+R plus gemcitabine-oxaliplatin (M+R-GemOx), in R/R DLBCL. After magrolimab priming, 4 groups of patients received M+R, 10 to 45 mg/kg magrolimab with 375 mg/m2 rituximab; patients receiving M+R-GemOx received 30 or 45 mg/kg magrolimab with 375 mg/m2 rituximab, 1000 mg/m2 gemcitabine, and 100 mg/m2 oxaliplatin. Primary end points were treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Of 132 patients treated, 99 received M+R and 33 received M+R-GemOx. Most common any-grade TEAEs were fatigue (M+R, 40%; M+R-GemOx, 70%), infusion-related reactions (M+R, 39%), or anemia (M+R-GemOx, 70%). Treatment-related TEAEs led to magrolimab discontinuation in 7% (M+R) and 6% (M+R-GemOx). One death was considered treatment related (M+R-GemOx, colitis). M+R ORR was 24% (CR, 12%), and median DOR was 9.3 months. Median PFS and OS were 1.8 and 9.2 months, respectively. M+R-GemOx ORR was 52% (CR, 39%); 12-month DOR rate was 66.6% (95% confidence interval, 33.1-86.1). Median PFS and OS were 3.9 months and not reached, respectively. These results demonstrate that M+R with/without GemOx is well tolerated, and M+R-GemOx has clinical activity in patients with R/R DLBCL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02953509.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseRituximabAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDeoxycytidineFemaleGemcitabineHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeDeoxycytidineGemcitabineRituximab

Identifiers

PMID39293083
PMCPMC11609519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.