Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39292738›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Interprofessional collaboration during a specialised mobile palliative care service pilot in the rural area of Lucerne.

Sahra Maria Anna Bucher, Anne Marie Schumacher Dimech, Beat Müller, Patrick E Beeler

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sahra Maria Anna BucherFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Luzern, Luzern, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0006-5271-0591
Anne Marie Schumacher DimechFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Luzern, Luzern, Switzerland.
Beat MüllerFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Luzern, Luzern, Switzerland.
Patrick E BeelerCenter for Primary and Community Care, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6097-2480

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interprofessional collaboration in outpatient palliative care is critical to ensuring good quality of care in the home care sector. We investigated facilitators and barriers (FaBs) of interprofessional collaboration among healthcare professionals who participated in a 6-month pilot of a newly implemented specialised mobile palliative care service (SMPCS) in rural Lucerne. This study used a mixed-methods approach to collect (i) qualitative data on FaBs as perceived by nurses and primary care physicians (PCPs), and (ii) quantitative data across the entire interprofessional collaboration using a validated questionnaire expanded with 10 specific questions about the pilot. Identified facilitators of interprofessional collaboration were (i) use of standardised documents, (ii) clear allocation of responsibilities, (iii) regular exchange and clear communication and (iv) consideration of care coordination. Reported barriers were (i) a deficit of knowledge and experience of palliative care among PCPs and (ii) time constraints. This study provides valuable insights into FaBs of interprofessional collaboration in palliative care. Several recommendations can be drawn for how interprofessional collaboration may be optimised. Awareness of FaBs and their consideration in the implementation phase of new services can strengthen the foundation for a successful interprofessional collaboration.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorInterprofessional RelationsPalliative CareAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsRural Health ServicesRural PopulationSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID39292738
PMCPMC11410264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.