Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39292663›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Food and fluid intake during labor in maternity wards: A scoping review protocol.

Brenda Kelly Pontes Soares, Byanca Rodrigues Carneiro, Ilana Bruna de Lima Feitoza, Anna Cecilia Queiroz de Medeiros, Adriana Gomes Magalhães

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brenda Kelly Pontes SoaresMaster's Student from the Graduate Program in Collective Health (PPGSACOL/UFRN), Nurse from the Faculty of Health Sciences of Trairi (FACISA/UFRN), Santa Cruz, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7873-1653
Byanca Rodrigues CarneiroMaster's Student in the Graduate Program in Sciences Applied to Women's Health (PPgCASM), Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Ilana Bruna de Lima FeitozaNutritionist Specialized in Maternal and Child Health from the Multiprofessional Residency Program, Ana Bezerra University Hospital (HUAB), Santa Cruz, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Anna Cecilia Queiroz de MedeirosDoctor in Psychobiology from the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Nutritionist from the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Santa Cruz, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Adriana Gomes MagalhãesDoctor in Physiotherapy from the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Physiotherapist from the Federal University of Paraíba (UFPB), Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the 1940s, aspiration of stomach contents was recognized as a serious problem during labor, which is why fluid and food restriction was adopted for women who would undergo general anesthesia. Currently, the practice of generalized food restriction is a routine that is being discontinued. This review aims to map the evidence on the effects of the intake of foods, supplements and drinks in women on labor outcomes. To that end, documents investigating this topic in pregnant women admitted for uncomplicated deliveries in maternity wards, published from 2013 onwards, will be assessed. This interval was defined based on the publication by Singata et al., who carried out a systematic review on the benefits and harms of oral fluid intake or food restriction during labor. The scoping review methods of the JBI and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Review (PRISMA) were followed. Firstly, a preliminary search was carried out to identify the existence of similar scoping reviews or protocols, as well as the keywords and MeSH descriptors in the titles and abstracts, with a view to developing a complete search strategy. Subsequently, a search will be carried out in the Cochrane Library, Medline/PubMed, Embase, SCOPUS and Web of Science databases. The search strategy will be adapted for each of these databases. Finally, a reverse search will be carried out using the references of the included studies. The obtained documents will be imported into Rayyan for duplicate detection and removal. Two independent reviewers will read the titles and abstracts, observing the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The data extraction from each included study will be carried out independently by two reviewers, using the extraction form created for this purpose. In order to report results, we will follow the PRISMA checklist and report descriptive statistics and a narrative summary.

Indexed as

Labor, ObstetricDrinkingEatingFemaleHumansPregnancyScoping Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID39292663
PMCPMC11410181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.