ArticlePloS one2024
Tactile sensitivity alters textile touch perception.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tactility plays a crucial role in our interactions with the physical world including our ability to differentiate textile textures and their associated comfort. There is an increasing focus on digitally interactive haptic experiences enabling consumers to feel virtual objects realistically. This could revolutionize how we experience textiles in e-commerce platform, virtual and augmented reality, and shape the future of textiles in the metaverse. In this study, we examined the impact of tactile sensitivity on touch perception of a large nonhomogeneous sample of 22 textile swatches. The tactile sensitivity was studied using four factors: assessors' "subject-matter expertise", "frequency of performing handiwork", "frequency of working with textiles", and "familiarity of textile textures". The participants noted their tactile assessment of eight touch attributes of textile swatches on a 5-point Likert scale. Through predictive modeling, we analyzed the effect of tactile sensitivity on participants' tactile assessment scores. Our key findings revealed that participants' tactile sensitivity significantly influenced their perception of the textile textures. Notably, the "frequency of working with textiles" had the most substantial impact on participants' tactile ratings followed by their familiarity with textile textures. Interestingly, the perceptual differences of isotropy attribute were significant in all the cases. Overall, there was no significant difference in the tactile ratings between textile experts and non-experts, except for nine occurrences, four of which were related to perceptual differences in roughness of the woven fabrics. Conversely, the two groups had no statistically significant differences at all in their perceptions of hairiness, scratchiness, and uniformity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.