ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
Structure-inclusive similarity based directed GNN: a method that can control information flow to predict drug-target binding affinity.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Insights into SIRT2 inhibition from machine learning-assisted multi-level screening of the NCI database.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Antiviral drug discovery and development: challenges and future directions.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Leveraging artificial intelligence in antibody-drug conjugate development: from target identification to clinical translation in oncology.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Review
- Sequence-only prediction of binding affinity changes: a robust and interpretable model for antibody engineering.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationExploring the association between drugs and targets is essential for drug discovery and repurposing. Comparing with the traditional methods that regard the exploration as a binary classification task, predicting the drug-target binding affinity can provide more specific information. Many studies work based on the assumption that similar drugs may interact with the same target. These methods constructed a symmetric graph according to the undirected drug similarity or target similarity. Although these similarities can measure the difference between two molecules, it is unable to analyze the inclusion relationship of their substructure. For example, if drug A contains all the substructures of drug B, then in the message-passing mechanism of the graph neural network, drug A should acquire all the properties of drug B, while drug B should only obtain some of the properties of A.
resultsTo this end, we proposed a structure-inclusive similarity (SIS) which measures the similarity of two drugs by considering the inclusion relationship of their substructures. Based on SIS, we constructed a drug graph and a target graph, respectively, and predicted the binding affinities between drugs and targets by a graph convolutional network-based model. Experimental results show that considering the inclusion relationship of the substructure of two molecules can effectively improve the accuracy of the prediction model. The performance of our SIS-based prediction method outperforms several state-of-the-art methods for drug-target binding affinity prediction. The case studies demonstrate that our model is a practical tool to predict the binding affinity between drugs and targets. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source codes and data are available at https://github.com/HuangStomach/SISDTA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.