ReviewThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2024
Comprehensive review of artifacts in cardiac MRI and their mitigation.
Review in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regional Myocardial Tissue Characterization by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Is Associated With Heart Failure Development in Asymptomatic Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy.Circulation reports · 2026Article
- Pre-Imaging Clinical Factors Associated With Cardiac MR Image Quality Using Large Language Model-Enabled Data Extraction.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- Assessing the robustness of an artificial intelligence segmentation model for quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging across cardiac phenotypes.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- Predictors of late gadolinium enhancement cardiac MRI image quality in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices.Heart rhythm O2 · 2025Article
- Factors Affecting the Quality of Non-contrast Coronary Magnetic Resonance Angiography Images: Challenges and Change.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Neovascularization in Atherosclerotic Plaques: Clinical Implications, Detection, and Prevention Strategies.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Simultaneous myocardial T1, T2, T1ρ and fat fraction mapping with hybrid dual-echo cartesian acquisition and dictionary matching.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic ResonanceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is an important clinical tool that obtains high-quality images for assessment of cardiac morphology, function, and tissue characteristics. However, the technique may be prone to artifacts that may limit the diagnostic interpretation of images. This article reviews common artifacts which may appear in CMR exams by describing their appearance, the challenges they mitigate true pathology, and offering possible solutions to reduce their impact. Additionally, this article acts as an update to previous CMR artifacts reports by including discussion about new CMR innovations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39292396What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.